----What I wanted---yea I am a very happy camper when we lose what are you crazy???---So wait---what were Haacks wins??----I hate that this thing gets into the QB war but yes Nixon would be my Qb----just think it isn't cool to knock a guy going for almost 500 yards in offense----But we will agree to disagree----I will trust Hud with what is our best chance of winning and all have the right to disagree but I will take this last 4 years 36-16 record's opinion!!!
This is the worst set of WR, for whatever reason, I can ever remember at this school.
A true slot guy is the best wideout/deep threat we have.
We have a converted LB at the slot.
We have the Mr. Overhyped at the other wideout.
With all of that, I would still have Haack at QB for 3 reasons.
1) I trust him more to make a throw when we need it more than Nixon.
2) Nixon's obvious running ability and size make him the ideal RB.
3) Having Nixon at RB would free up the most dangerous man in the country to wreak havoc all over the field.
It is all about the scheme and lack of creativity. We recruited size over speed with the exception of Scott, Haynes and Fuse (quickness). Yet we don't do a good job of running crossing routes or rubs to help create more separation.
A lot of time we have multiple WR open but by the time the ball is delivered that window has closed. This isn't high school, a half step on a guy is open. Very rarely do you get more than a half step in college.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)