Well, that is not entirely fair to say. If we were running a true option offense like Navy or Georgia Tech, he would excel in them, but in the offense we run, he will continue to be exposed against the better teams.
The worst QB we have ever sent out there as a starter was the Nick Dugas experiment of Baldwin, another athlete playing out of position.
----What I wanted---yea I am a very happy camper when we lose what are you crazy???---So wait---what were Haacks wins??----I hate that this thing gets into the QB war but yes Nixon would be my Qb----just think it isn't cool to knock a guy going for almost 500 yards in offense----But we will agree to disagree----I will trust Hud with what is our best chance of winning and all have the right to disagree but I will take this last 4 years 36-16 record's opinion!!!
This is the worst set of WR, for whatever reason, I can ever remember at this school.
A true slot guy is the best wideout/deep threat we have.
We have a converted LB at the slot.
We have the Mr. Overhyped at the other wideout.
With all of that, I would still have Haack at QB for 3 reasons.
1) I trust him more to make a throw when we need it more than Nixon.
2) Nixon's obvious running ability and size make him the ideal RB.
3) Having Nixon at RB would free up the most dangerous man in the country to wreak havoc all over the field.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)