So, you made some very good points, most of which I agree with. However, I also agree that Dr. A not only ‘starved’ athletics, he seemed to want to, at the very least, ‘strangle’ it. Which is a very different thing. I truly believe he very much would have been happy with us having no athletics at all, and letting TSAB have it all. Which he almost succeeded at doing.
But I guess I’m also trying to determine what your ultimate point was. I mean you start off by quoting my post where I state that I think Stephens is our best president, with Savoie closing in on him.
Your response starts by having a sentence saying, basically, that each president was a great one, for the time that they served. But then the rest of your post is mostly about Authement.
Guess I’m wondering if you’re saying Authement was the best? I just wish you would’ve stated what you think the ranking of the presidents should be. I would really like to red your thoughts on that.
Cheers
Maybe the Governor could set up a Department of University Efficiency similar to DOGE and have a thorough review of the university systems and the efficiency and effectiveness of each university recommending cost cutting and cost savings. 3 options: 1. eliminate some universities, 2. consolidate some universities, 3. designate universities of each system as Flagship (and not just one flagship for the whole state) and all others as undergrad only feeding into the Flagships thereby eliminating a lot of duplication and waste.
The Author of this thread will tell you Dr. Authement had a great master plan for athletics and gave it just enough to survive. All revisionist history and a big load of nonsense. I'm already sorry I decided to even read it.
Dr. Savoie has been light years away from his predecessor and did the right thing in hiring
a consultant to put together an actual Master Plan together because he didn't have a clue.
And for the record, the University of Louisiana @ Lafayette is currently carrying over $400M in debt.
Until Dr. Ray all UL Presidents came from the College of Agriculture. The college and the farm are now no more. Which stands to reason, farming is not what it once was especially around here.
I think the University saw it's most growth from the 60s to the 80s. It has stagnated after that and other schools we used to be bigger than (including some SEC schools) have now passed us by enrollment wise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)