I was agreeing that we need to give ALL scholly sports a chance to succeed. If their attendance isn't good, even in good years, should those athletes be ignored? I say "Hell no!". Coach Rogers has proven he can't do the job, and the university needs to hire someone who can. And if money is too much of a deterrent, give someone who won't cost as much a chance. Again, status quo is/has been unacceptable.

Originally Posted by
Boomer
OK So why was he retained???? He is a great recruiter----He is a great coach---He draws the fans----He has a great record----He has a sure championship team coming back----He wasn't given a chance----He was promised a palace to play in when hired----We ALL know that the answer to all these questions are---NO---This forum is open to reasons he could possibly be kept!!!! Anybody up for it????
igeaux.mobi