If a coach has job security after multiple losing seasons, then it must be accepted that the administration at his institution has decided that athletics aren't a priority in the university's mission, they're merely another necessary expense, like groundskeeping maintenance.
Although I'm admittedly an outsider, I cannot understand the "can we afford?" line of questioning. No school can afford the going rate for a quality coach, let alone the costs involved in maintaining the arms race...but, conversely, football is one of the very few areas in higher ed where the initial investment and continued commitment has the ability to turn a profit. Currently, the real question for any school is "can we afford not to perpetuate the growing expense?"
I'll have to dig through my files, but I saved a few good articles and spreadsheets from the NCAA website that broke down NCAA football profit/loses by institution. What I found fascinating weren't the huge profits made by the traditional programs, but the trend over the past 10 years for everybody else. Even some D1AA schools have started to cut losses/break even, and amazingly enough a couple actually are turning profits. The numbers defy all reason and are entirely counter-intuitive. For instance Connecticut put forth a mediocre effort for upgrade to 1A in '00...yet somehow football already out-earns a basketball program with 2NCs in the last 10 years...by a significant amount.
Furthermore, being a Troy Alum as well, I've seen how signing on for 'rent a slaughters' can finance the entire athletics dept. If UL merely dropped the McNeese State game and the annual MAC matchup, they could earn $600K-$1mil/game signing on for another school's open dates. Without even batting an eyelash, the athletics dept has another $1-1.5 mil to upgrade their staff.
Look at UNC, that program was terrible for a long time, and still has substandard facilities...Paying Butch Davis $2.1mil/yr has quickly changed from a perception of gross fiscal responsibility, to that of an astute investment in less than 2 years.
Tucked away atop a filing cabinet in the front office of ULM's Malone Stadium sits a boot-shaped trophy known to few. In 2002, the trophy was created for the UL-ULM football game, which was named "The Battle on the Bayou" that year in an attempt to spark interest for the in-state contest.
The Warhawks beat the Ragin' Cajuns that season, 34-10, at Malone Stadium. It marked the end of a 3-9 campaign for both teams.
A plate with the date and score was added to the trophy for that game. There was space for the addition of future dates and scores.
But the trophy never left Monroe.
The rest of the story
Joshua Parrott • jparrott@theadvertiser.com • October 4, 2008
OK I found the it in a previous post .... "LAFAYETTE – University of Louisiana at Lafayette head football coach Rickey Bustle has agreed to a two-year contract extension, keeping him on the sideline through the 2010 season, ..."
Also, if I am not mistaken he has options for automatic extensions. I can not recall exactly what they are. Possibly winning the Sun Belt and a bowl game. 1 year for each accomplishment.
If we win the Sun Belt, will this be a topic of discussion? I am sure it still will be ...
Again, I say we focus on what we have good on the field right now. A group of guys who truly want to win and who put forth 110% on the field each game.
This is like putting lipstick on a pig.
Do I want the Cajuns to win it? Absolutely, just like the other 8 games left on the schedule. But, it's no "rivalry game" to me.
![]()
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)