It is on www.ncaa.com
It still has not updated. Maybe it won't until tomorrow.
From the home page go to Sports, then
Basketball, then
Men.
Find the link for Rankings, then tap the droplIst and select RPI.
It is on www.ncaa.com
It still has not updated. Maybe it won't until tomorrow.
From the home page go to Sports, then
Basketball, then
Men.
Find the link for Rankings, then tap the droplIst and select RPI.
This is the only one that's official.
http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/weekly...17MBBrpi3.html
Through Games of: Jan. 7, 2017
Generated: Sunday 01/08/17 12:01 PM
------- Division I Only --------
Rank Prev Rank Name Conf W-L Road Neut Home Non-Div I
46 35 UT Arlington Sun Belt 12-4 6-4 0-0 4-0 2-0
62 49 Arkansas St. Sun Belt 11-5 4-4 1-1 5-0 1-0
82 73 Louisiana Sun Belt 12-4 4-4 0-0 6-0 2-0
102 117 Ga. Southern Sun Belt 9-6 3-5 2-0 2-1 2-0
104 116 Georgia St. Sun Belt 8-6 1-5 2-0 3-1 2-0
202 231 Coastal Caro. Sun Belt 7-9 1-5 1-0 3-4 2-0
208 222 Little Rock Sun Belt 11-5 3-2 2-1 4-2 2-0
224 218 South Ala. Sun Belt 8-7 2-4 0-0 4-3 2-0
247 245 Troy Sun Belt 8-8 1-7 2-0 3-1 2-0
265 247 Appalachian St. Sun Belt 5-9 1-7 0-0 2-2 2-0
291 324 Texas St. Sun Belt 9-6 1-4 2-0 4-2 2-0
295 290 La.-Monroe Sun Belt 6-10 1-7 0-3 3-0 2-0
Got to be fair to the women:
http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/weekly...17WBBrpi3.html
46 64 UT Arlington Sun Belt 10-3 3-2 1-0 4-1 2-0
53 63 Little Rock Sun Belt 10-6 5-4 0-0 5-2 0-0
109 113 Troy Sun Belt 10-4 4-3 2-0 2-1 2-0
168 163 Appalachian St. Sun Belt 7-8 3-5 1-0 3-3 0-0
178 204 South Ala. Sun Belt 7-7 3-3 1-1 1-3 2-0
180 162 Louisiana Sun Belt 8-4 2-2 1-1 3-1 2-0
240 240 Texas St. Sun Belt 6-8 2-4 0-0 4-3 0-1
249 224 Georgia St. Sun Belt 5-9 2-2 1-2 1-5 1-0
267 268 Coastal Caro. Sun Belt 6-8 2-5 1-0 2-2 1-1
314 316 Ga. Southern Sun Belt 4-10 1-5 0-0 2-5 1-0
318 314 Arkansas St. Sun Belt 3-13 0-8 1-2 2-3 0-0
339 343 La.-Monroe Sun Belt 3-11 1-7 0-0 0-4 2-0
Cajuns fall to 83 today, per Warren Nolan; NCAA not yet updated.
EDIT:
Home/Road is more severe in basketball. Totally missed that note in the formula I was looking at
Nicholls had a great RPI because their Strength of Schedule was #6 late last week. They played a good deal of teams with great W/L records. Even having a record just over .500, they were boosted by the other factors in the formula.
You are right though, it is not a perfect tool. Also, it does improve as more teams play each other as GoneGolfin notes in baseball discussions
"Thread: RPI Musings
Why? Start your own thread"
The title of the thread is RPI Musings. It does not specify gender.
There is a home/away adjustment to the formula. Not sure exactly what it is. I have always felt there should be an adjustment to the formula so as it is 1/3 for all three factors. Reason for that is mid majors do not get the opportunity to have TV schools come to their place. If you are in a major conference you do. That is why teams that are 6 and 10 in major leagues get considered for the tourney as they likely pulled a big home upset. Like most things in the NCAA, things are set to help the major teams. That is life and you just have to overcome it. I simply point this out for fans of major schools. Some of which I have little respect for as they do not play out of conference road games. LSU is an example. The only true non conference road game they played was at Wake Forest. Other than Houston, all of their home games in non-conference were rent-a-wins (paid opponent to go to Baton Rouge without having to make a return visit). Not picking on the Tigers specifically, but that is common for many schools in the major leagues and many of their fans are not even aware of this advantage. Another way the RPI could be improved is to give less credence to home rent-a-wins. In other words a home win in a game in which you return the visit the next year would carry more weight than one in which you simply pay the opponent to show up. I bet that would change the scheduling approach for many teams and the tool would then become a more accurate representation of the strength of teams.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)