Cajuns fall to 83 today, per Warren Nolan; NCAA not yet updated.
Cajuns fall to 83 today, per Warren Nolan; NCAA not yet updated.
EDIT:
Home/Road is more severe in basketball. Totally missed that note in the formula I was looking at
Nicholls had a great RPI because their Strength of Schedule was #6 late last week. They played a good deal of teams with great W/L records. Even having a record just over .500, they were boosted by the other factors in the formula.
You are right though, it is not a perfect tool. Also, it does improve as more teams play each other as GoneGolfin notes in baseball discussions
"Thread: RPI Musings
Why? Start your own thread"
The title of the thread is RPI Musings. It does not specify gender.
There is a home/away adjustment to the formula. Not sure exactly what it is. I have always felt there should be an adjustment to the formula so as it is 1/3 for all three factors. Reason for that is mid majors do not get the opportunity to have TV schools come to their place. If you are in a major conference you do. That is why teams that are 6 and 10 in major leagues get considered for the tourney as they likely pulled a big home upset. Like most things in the NCAA, things are set to help the major teams. That is life and you just have to overcome it. I simply point this out for fans of major schools. Some of which I have little respect for as they do not play out of conference road games. LSU is an example. The only true non conference road game they played was at Wake Forest. Other than Houston, all of their home games in non-conference were rent-a-wins (paid opponent to go to Baton Rouge without having to make a return visit). Not picking on the Tigers specifically, but that is common for many schools in the major leagues and many of their fans are not even aware of this advantage. Another way the RPI could be improved is to give less credence to home rent-a-wins. In other words a home win in a game in which you return the visit the next year would carry more weight than one in which you simply pay the opponent to show up. I bet that would change the scheduling approach for many teams and the tool would then become a more accurate representation of the strength of teams.
Yep, I missed the note on that formula. That is my bad.
The home road factors in baseball are 1.3 and 0.7.
Basketball is 1.4 and 0.6. Even harsher penalty for a home loss and bigger reward for road win. That affects the first portion of the formula (your win percentage)
And here is another one for your perusal: TeamRankings.com
TeamRankings Logo
Louisiana-Lafayette Logo
Louisiana-Lafayette Basketball
Predictions Update
Jan 8, 2017
• After beating LA Monroe 69-60 yesterday, Louisiana-Lafayette is now projected to finish the regular season 22-9 (12-6 Sun Belt).
• The odds that the Ragin' Cajuns make the NCAA tournament are currently 35%.
• We currently rank Louisiana-Lafayette as the #96 team in the country, and the #2 team in the Sun Belt.
• Next game: Sat, Jan 14 vs. #133 GA Southern. Our power ratings give the Ragin' Cajuns a 74% chance to win.
Bracketology Projections
NCAA Updated: Cajuns at 83.
Women at 184
Sagarin still has some of the 2015-16 year weighted in. When this ages out (dont know when, it's well overdue) you'll see UL shoot up here. Sunbelt in general will improve.
Ah, that explains a lot: i saw on the @ruston board they have a thread based on sagarin rankings. In it, we are at virtuallty the same ranking as the mutts, when of course that is not at all the case. Guess you have to hang your hat on something when your team breaks the loosing streak of one of the worst teams currently playing, utsa.....in rustonia. Lol.
Delaware State's 1 point road victory over a team with a winning record bumped the men up 3 spots.
http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/weekly...17MBBrpi3.html
42 43 UT Arlington Sun Belt 12-4 6-4 0-0 4-0 2-0
72 72 Arkansas St. Sun Belt 11-6 4-5 1-1 5-0 1-0
84 87 Louisiana Sun Belt 12-4 4-4 0-0 6-0 2-0
103 103 Ga. Southern Sun Belt 10-6 3-5 2-0 3-1 2-0
137 143 Georgia St. Sun Belt 8-7 1-5 2-0 3-2 2-0
196 188 Coastal Caro. Sun Belt 8-9 1-5 1-0 4-4 2-0
214 214 Little Rock Sun Belt 11-6 3-3 2-1 4-2 2-0
224 224 Troy Sun Belt 9-8 2-7 2-0 3-1 2-0
227 229 South Ala. Sun Belt 8-8 2-5 0-0 4-3 2-0
244 240 Appalachian St. Sun Belt 6-9 1-7 0-0 3-2 2-0
284 283 Texas St. Sun Belt 9-6 1-4 2-0 4-2 2-0
295 293 La.-Monroe Sun Belt 6-10 1-7 0-3 3-0 2-0
Women have work to do.
http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/weekly...17WBBrpi3.html
47 46 UT Arlington Sun Belt 10-3 3-2 1-0 4-1 2-0
51 52 Little Rock Sun Belt 10-6 5-4 0-0 5-2 0-0
105 100 Troy Sun Belt 10-4 4-3 2-0 2-1 2-0
155 164 Appalachian St. Sun Belt 7-8 3-5 1-0 3-3 0-0
168 170 South Ala. Sun Belt 7-7 3-3 1-1 1-3 2-0
184 185 Louisiana Sun Belt 8-4 2-2 1-1 3-1 2-0
244 244 Texas St. Sun Belt 6-8 2-4 0-0 4-3 0-1
250 249 Georgia St. Sun Belt 5-9 2-2 1-2 1-5 1-0
259 263 Coastal Caro. Sun Belt 6-8 2-5 1-0 2-2 1-1
313 315 Ga. Southern Sun Belt 4-10 1-5 0-0 2-5 1-0
320 319 Arkansas St. Sun Belt 3-13 0-8 1-2 2-3 0-0
340 340 La.-Monroe Sun Belt 3-11 1-7 0-0 0-4 2-0
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)