well even if Mullen does leave, we safe. I know Hud would want it but i really don't see State going with Hud.
well even if Mullen does leave, we safe. I know Hud would want it but i really don't see State going with Hud.
I think you are jumping the gun labeling the Michigan job as a dead end position. Unless you felt the same way about USC prior to Carrol, or Flordia after Spurrier and before Myer, etc. A college football program has its ups and downs. Being a cajun fan you should know this more than most. With that being said, Michigan is far from being a dead end position. Next thing you will say is that Texas' head coaching position is a dead end job.
Deadend? Being second only to Texas in money available? Michigan is one of the more marketable names in apparel...and that is with a decade of mediocrity. It's one of the more prestigious jobs in the country. Michigan isn't a sleeping giant...they are a fat, lazy, out of shape giant...that the world needs to fear if they ditch the couch and hit the gym.
There was a little spat between them when he was the coach at Stanford. He made a comment saying unlike Michigan coaches, he can't just stick his players in PE classes to maintain academic eligibility. It was definitely a gut shot for university who prides itself on academics. However the lure of returning to greatness will override any lingering resentment. I also think Michigan will finally open up its purse strings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)