First, I don't "hate" anybody. I'm severely disappointed in the current shape of our school system and those running it that have fought ideas for improvement because they weren't invented by them and required internal scrutiny as opposed to external blame.
I'm disappointed too. How can you not be? But again I would love for you to provide an example of a person who fought ideas for improvement and what improvement they fought against. Just saying "Intellectuals" or "They" could mean anyone.
Now, you get to work on a list of Louisiana public school system officials over the past 30 years that you wish to exclude from the responsibility of the regression of the Louisiana school system and I promise you your list will be shorter. If you doubt the self-professed intellectualism of these people, you don't know many. And no, I'm not calling out individuals by name on this forum.
In your opinion what makes someone an intellectual? And since most people consider it a compliment to be called intellectual why do you think it's a negative thing? And why don't you want to call responsible persons or groups out by name on this forum? Saying "They" narrows the list down to absolutely everyone! If you have a beef with the way someone handled a situation be a man and list names.
If in this post you're attempting to tell me that the Louisiana public school system does not "suck"... please provide me with an essay, single spaced, that defends the system and the current product. Start off by telling us who's been running the Louisiana school system. Then tell us how well it's functioning... and please don't do what they do... point to the gifted children that essentially learn on their own... only to help prop up the numbers. You may be able, by virture of this very simple connecting of the dots, come to the same conclusion as most of us.
Here's my essay (single-spaced): I think the public school system sucks. I think an expanded voucher program would do good things for the state. I also think the elimination of teacher's collective-bargaining rights as well as other rules that eliminate the incentive for teachers to do a great job. But I think by far the biggest problem is the fact that a sickening amount of parents in this state don't consider education to be a priority and don't push their kids to learn and get good grades. The under-performance has much more to do with the children who don't try than the shortcomings from our system. I also know that there are tons of kids who get good educations and are successful in these "under-performing" schools so it's not a complete system failure.
And to answer your other question the BESE board technically "Runs" our school system along with the local school boards. And a majority of the members of the BESE board over the past 25 years have been Republicans and/or conservative. So am I right in assuming that Republicans are the people you call intellectuals?
As for explaining "what" was done by the "intellectuals" that contributed to the destruction... I've already posted some of those in an earlier post. Go read it. You are at a substantial disadvantage if you believe our public schools are doing just fine. Oh, don't tell me... you believe they just need more money and "they" will "fix things"... again... by themselves. That's been tried. They "suck"... and the vacuum is only getting worse. Again, other than the effort given to fabricate results, or ignore the entire body of work, please explain how well the system currently works.
I don't think more money will fix things. See my essay above. And please tell me who is "fabricating results" or "ignoring the body of work." Again it would be helpful if you didn't answer "They."
And if you are one of these "intellectuals", please give us your background so that we can add you to "the list". I eagerly await "your" response.
I still don't know what you consider an "intellectual" to be so I can't answer your question.