No argument with your assessment of our admin and the probable poor wording of the contract. And I understand what you are saying about the contract being different from the usual "at will" hire. My argument is that by the administration paying out his salary he has already recovered any damages the lack of 30 days notice caused him. He is delusional if he thinks being given 30 days notice was going to improve or salvage his reputation in any way. His record speaks for itself. Any rational human being, much less a judge, should be able to see that Baldwin has been more than adequately compensated. Additionally, they should look at his constantly changing basis for his lawsuits (racism, failure to get 30 days notice, inadequate resources, etc) and deduce that he is grasping for straws. The man was a failure as a head coach. IMO, his teams were not adequately prepared he made poor personnel decisions, poor in game decisions and too often recruited players who may have been talented athletes but could not handle the academic side of college and consequently could not get on the field.
A good attorney would have pointed this out. Of course a good attorney wouldn't have written this crappy contract the way it was interpreted to begin with. Let's face it. This was the lowest point of a school adminsitration who drug this community & it's repuatation into the abyss. I feel for Nelson because personnaly I liked the guy, but this school was being run by a survivor of the deepression era who just couldn't get over it. A lot of stuff happened between the depression and the the 21st century. But you wouldn't know it to look at Aurhement's record.
Couldn't we offer the throw in a hundred years of toothpicks?
The Louisiana Supreme Court has granted a writ filed by former UL head football coach Jerry Baldwin, now a north Louisiana minister, in his bid to get money after being canned by the university following the 2001 season.
The rest of the story
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)