I know we get tagged with the 'small ball" philosophy and we certainly play ball that way sometimes (every team does) but I don't think that is the only way we play. I guess the point is that what the discussion should be about is how much "small ball" do we play? Do we depend on it too much?
I did find one stat of interest. From 99-02 in MLB the scoring percentage with a man on first and no outs was .953. The percentage with a man on second and one out was .725 So on the surface it appears that sacrificing in the pro ranks is not the best philosophy. I'm not sure you can make a direct correlation to college ball with that but I don't think your going to see a shift of over 20% to turn it upside down so it probably stands true in college as well.