It is a rare player that gets to play his true freshmen year especially an offensive linemen, they simply are not ready. It doesn't mean they aren't great players they need time to learn the plays and to grow. Ross use to be an offensive player (not a linemen) so I have to assume that since he is playing defense he too is learning something new. I have learned through years of dealing with football that it is best to leave who plays and who doesn't to the coaches. A true freshmen may be ready to play half way through the season, do you waste a year of their 5 years on half a season even a losing season? I don't think Spurrier would do that either. That's why the NCAA gives a player 5 years to play 4. Believe me when I tell you that if you insult one player you insult the whole team and that hits very close to home.
Do you think FSU doesn't hand out helmet stickers if the team loses? If that were the
case, the team would have hardly stickers on their helmets these past few years.
Individual accolades in conjuction with a loss or win are always taken in context. Immediate positive reinforcement works well on children and most animals, but human adults do not necessarily respond as well to that kind of behavior modifier.
I doubt that the players are going 100% effort in order just to get the award at Tuesday meetings. I know I wouldn't. They are going 100% because they want to win the game.
Guess I am talking more conceptual.... Why do we accept a situation where it is "predictable" that we are mediocre in the worst conference in the country after 6 years... Thats my gripe... Had I prognosticated I am sure I would have picked those losses as well... But I am screaming WHY??
I dont want to accept a mentality of.... oh well.. year 6.. 3-4 wins... thats the reality of things...
How do we change the reality? I say 6 years into the program is enough time for any coach to realistically EXPECT to be competing for a championship... but we are not... others on here tell me to be patient...
When do we say enough? As a Cajun fan I'll keep coming back but I would like there to be some accountability at some point. If year 6 "aint it" fine.... When??
My answer is NOW..... if we have to start all over.. so be it... hold the "picker of the coach" accountable... My other complaint is that we have an AD that neither sought nor wanted the job... we have what appears to me to be a collection of "Good ole boys" running this administration that is satisfied to hob nob with each other... have a good time with their media friends... and nothing changes... My hope is a new President will come in and change that good ole boy network...
I think this university can be every bit as "big time" as Southern Miss... as East Carolina...as.. dare I say it.. Central Florida... Troy.... We have one big Monster in this state... Troy has Bama and Auburn... Southern Miss has Mississippi State and Ole Miss... Central Florida has a ton of competition... We need to step up and say... We are going to be #2 in this state... Not you Tech... Not you ULM... not you Tulane.... and then DEMAND that those running the show put us on a path to that goal... and make reasonable progress towards that goal.... that when they are hired they be given a time certain to produce.... 6 years? sounds good to me... I agree there needs to be some funding advancements but dont hide behind that.... progress is demanded... small steps are accepted... let this be a 20 year program to achieve the level of the universities I mentioned above... but show progress.... each year.... put McNeese behind us once and for all... then ULM... then Tech... then Tulane....
A plan for Athletic progress should be part of the screening of a new President... to accompany academic progress and not be dwarfed by it....
A man can dream can't he???????
Have you ever placed a call(s) to David Walker, Scott Farmer, Ray Authement to tell them your thoughts? They might not enjoy it, but would appreciate it.
I know its a tired arguement, but don't most/all fo those out of state schools ahve student fees to work with, or at least start building with. One thing is for sure, they don't ahve a gov't that is afraid to see them be successful.
I hear you... which is why I said I would like a question such as the one I raised, "what are your plans to increase athletic funding?", be asked of the candidates for president. I am not an insider so I dont know what Dr. A has tried and failed to do... As my handle indicates I know the powers with-in this state do everything to keep us from advancing... However we will not have this opportunity for new blood in the administration again anytime soon. I would hope the new President comes in with a renewed vigor and a plan to attack the problem. Will he/she be successful? Time will tell but good Lord I don't want to hear "we cant do anything because of the big bad wolf"....
A once in a generation opportunity is upon us..........
Ok, time to bring this thread to full circle.
Tuffguy started this thread with the suggestion that a lack of comments about the UCF game was maybe a sign that apathy was begining to set in.
Well, 80 posts later, that theory starts to take on water.
Regardless of how anyone feels about:
a) our 0-5 start (and it its a near universal dissappointment)
b) whether it's time for a change (fairly evenly divided on that one)
c) the motivation of those that do not want change
d) the motivation of those that do want change
...and I think that runs our complete gamut of thought...
The one thing that I don't see is apathy in this thread.
And whether there is disagreement on the best way to get there, the sense I get from this thread is that we all want our boys to be successful.
And that we'll all be there, rain or shine Saturday.
So, I'm ready to put this thread to bed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)