Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 96

Thread: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

  1. #11

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    I don't know because Nixon isn't a duel threat
    Exactly! Nixon was never a dual threat QB.

  2. #12

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    I don't know because Nixon isn't a duel threat
    I would not call Nixon a dual threat. But if you ask Hud, he would say that he is.

  3. #13

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Well I certainly hope to see more than a series or 2 from Davis on Saturday. At some point you need to play your most talented and quit worrying about fair. In fact, I'll go so far as to say he might be our only shot at winning this game with the offense that we have in place.


  4. Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by RaisingCajun08 View Post
    I would not call Nixon a dual threat. But if you ask Hud, he would say that he is.
    ---Well when you top 200 yards running and 250 yards passing against the best team we played, that is pretty dual ----Just typing what the stats say---please don't expand this anymore but at least give the kid credit for one of the great performances in UL history!!!

  5. #15

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Hudspeth has always wanted a dual threat guy. That has never changed. What Hudpseth is saying here is that the way we are running the zone read has to change. We have slowly morphed into some kind of power zone read without much read and were caught without the horses to do that.

    I took the article to say that we are going to spread the field again as much as possible and play guys where they are best suited to contribute. That's the "flow" thing he is talking about.

    He's admitting that the gameplan for the season was all wrong for various reasons. We knew that. Now, it's been said. Let's put this to bed and get going with the reboot of Louisiana football.

    I see a very intense off-season coming and I am looking forward to watching J.D. tear it up next season and the young defense play a lot better in year 2 of the scheme and the staff.

    Next year is going to be fun. It's going to be a fresh start. The slate will be wiped clean. I welcome the Jordan Davis era and this new chapter of Louisiana football.


  6. #16
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRebel View Post
    Exactly! Nixon was never a dual threat QB.
    My guess is that he's saying that Jordan Davis fits his idea of the original system he likes. He tweaked the system he likes over this past year... supposedly... to fit two QBs that had patiently waited their turn. Neither Haack or Nixon fit the dual threat that Hud likes. Nixon isn't strong enough of a passing threat... and Haack isn't strong enough of a running threat to meet the definition... and/or neither have the QB presence in the game to command an offense to victory. I think he played the middle too much as a coach... and that screwed us more than the QBs did.

    I believe Hud is paving the way for Jordan Davis (or Dion Ray) to clearly win out the QB competition going into next year. I don't care who he plays on the field if it gives us the best chance of winning. Every player is a Ragin Cajun. We had issues in just about every category... so I guess if I were the coach, I'd BS us too... and just go back in the staff meeting room and start brainstorming for next year.

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    My guess is that he's saying that Jordan Davis fits his idea of the original system he likes. He tweaked the system he likes over this past year... supposedly... to fit two QBs that had patiently waited their turn. Neither Haack or Nixon fit the dual threat that Hud likes. Nixon isn't strong enough of a passing threat... and Haack isn't strong enough of a running threat to meet the definition... and/or neither have the QB presence in the game to command an offense to victory. I think he played the middle too much as a coach... and that screwed us more than the QBs did.

    I believe Hud is paving the way for Jordan Davis (or Dion Ray) to clearly win out the QB competition going into next year. I don't care who he plays on the field if it gives us the best chance of winning. Every player is a Ragin Cajun. We had issues in just about every category... so I guess if I were the coach, I'd BS us too... and just go back in the staff meeting room and start brainstorming for next year.
    And it begs the question, if JD is going to be the man for 3 years, will Dion Ray go to an FCS school or will he play receiver. All I know is we've got to get him on the field. He's too talented to sit on the sideline.

  8. #18

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    ---Well when you top 200 yards running and 250 yards passing against the best team we played, that is pretty dual ----Just typing what the stats say---please don't expand this anymore but at least give the kid credit for one of the great performances in UL history!!!
    It was a very memorable performance Boomer. It was almost one of the best performances ever by a Cajun QB. Unfortunately, that game exposed some fatal flaws in our passing game with him at the helm.

    It appears now that if he wants to continue playing for the Cajuns it will be at RB. I hope he embraces this opportunity. He could be very special as a RB. He has tremendous skills that are being wasted with him on the bench. He could emerge neat season as a real team leader. You don't have to be a QB to do that.

  9. #19

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by CrappDaddy View Post
    And it begs the question, if JD is going to be the man for 3 years, will Dion Ray go to an FCS school or will he play receiver. All I know is we've got to get him on the field. He's too talented to sit on the sideline.
    The only way Dion Ray sees the field as a QB is if J.D. gets injured or fails completely. He knew who was on the roster when he signed. If he wants to stay at QB, he is going to have to wait his turn or perform miracles in practice.

  10. #20

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    My guess is that he's saying that Jordan Davis fits his idea of the original system he likes. He tweaked the system he likes over this past year... supposedly... to fit two QBs that had patiently waited their turn. Neither Haack or Nixon fit the dual threat that Hud likes. Nixon isn't strong enough of a passing threat... and Haack isn't strong enough of a running threat to meet the definition... and/or neither have the QB presence in the game to command an offense to victory. I think he played the middle too much as a coach... and that screwed us more than the QBs did.

    I believe Hud is paving the way for Jordan Davis (or Dion Ray) to clearly win out the QB competition going into next year. I don't care who he plays on the field if it gives us the best chance of winning. Every player is a Ragin Cajun. We had issues in just about every category... so I guess if I were the coach, I'd BS us too... and just go back in the staff meeting room and start brainstorming for next year.
    I really hope this is the case...Let the quarterback quarterback..take advantage of the talent we possess.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hudspeth doesn't run from UL's offensive woes
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: October 19th, 2016, 12:57 pm
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 15th, 2015, 12:55 am
  3. Hudspeth contemplates Jaguars' offensive options
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 28th, 2014, 09:15 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •