Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 133

Thread: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

  1. #101

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    Because obviously klaf type stations aren't considered 3rd tier rights... Broadcasting out of the footprint is. He can broadcast from his grandmothers basement all he wants. If we can have the RCN and control our own broadcasts, it's an even bigger mistake not doing that.
    so if the "deal" wasnt signed, we would be a go with CST in california?

  2. #102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dms4720 View Post
    so if the "deal" wasnt signed, we would be a go with CST in california?
    Yes, or if you could make California touch New Mexico

  3. #103

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    I figured you might take my comment that way, but I get asked this often and I don't see that question asked to certain people that post on this site. I wasn't trying to be sarcastic, just get tired of people asking a question that is seldom asked of others.

    ESPN has the third tier rights to the Sun Belt Conference because Benson agreed to them. Do you have a link to the Sun Belt Conference Contract with ESPN? I haven't found a link.

    So, if the ESPN contract states that the individual conference member schools can create their own station or network, and air it in any state the SBC has a school in, or in any state that touches state- but no states beyond that, then why is Farmer stating the area would be from Houston to the Florida Panhandle? Why not Arkansas, Georgia and North Carolina? And if that is the case, what happened to the CRN here in Louisiana once Benson bundled the SBC third tier rights to ESPN?

    So essentially what Farmer is saying is that because Benson bundled the SBC third tier rights over to ESPN and he agreed to sign over UL's third tier rights to the conference, he simply can only negotiate for the rights allowed in the area you mentioned with CST? Again, why would he enter into an agreement that would limit his programs television footprint? In either case, he made a decision without getting proper approval for and limits his athletic program's footprint. For the record, he is working with someone that the university has approved to handle the negotiations. I don't know that person.
    Thanks for being patient with me on this issue. I wasn't calling into question your integrity, in fact I was counting on it to get a viable answer rather than farmer is the root of all the UL woes.

    I am wondering also why he choose the I10 route, maybe it has something to do with the recruiting base, at least that what the article has said.

    very good about info about farmer haveing to work with a UL approved negotiator.

  4. #104

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    How could Benson have permission to bundle all of UL's television rights without Farmer agreeing to sign those rights over to the SBC?
    Is it a condition of membership?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    One last question, it's been common in the past for ESPN to sell their 2nd or 3rd tier rights to ABC and Raycom. Why wouldn't Benson try and sell the 2nd and 3rd tier rights himself to ABC and Raycom, rather then bundling the entire package to ESPN? I'm assuming that he had no leverage to do so, which would be the practical explanation in making his final decision.
    I really don't like Benson as the commissioner.

  5. #105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbuf View Post
    Thanks for being patient with me on this issue. I wasn't calling into question your integrity, in fact I was counting on it to get a viable answer rather than farmer is the root of all the UL woes.

    I am wondering also why he choose the I10 route, maybe it has something to do with the recruiting base, at least that what the article has said.

    very good about info about farmer haveing to work with a UL approved negotiator.
    Nothing wrong with what he is doing now, just disappointed he trusted Benson in the matter. I agree the I10 corridor makes sense for recruiting.

  6. #106

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Trust but verify!


  7. #107

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Did the SBC signing 3rd tier TV rights to ESPN have anything to do with blackouts? Maybe in doing that the blackouts are lifted on the ESPN3 broadcasts which allowed more "national exposure."

    Just guessing here...


  8. Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    Yes, or if you could make California touch New Mexico
    All you need is a "don't count the desert" exemption.

  9. #109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    All you need is a "don't count the desert" exemption.
    Maybe once Trump builds the wall it will count as connected

  10. Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    Maybe once Trump builds the wall it will count as connected
    Nice.

Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. LUS, Cox exploring wireless options
    By NewsCopy in forum News Acadiana
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 24th, 2010, 01:40 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •