Steve Hale Interview

[douglas]

Explain the number of guests viewing the thread...

101 guests. Lets Half-ish that number-50 guests. There are 50 university employees reading this telling someone to say something? Ill even say half that, 25 university employees.

[Boomer]

And to this point, it's our damn fault for not demanding better. We have an opportunity right now to make a difference in the university's future. Let them hear you, and hit
Them where it hurts...bank account

----I guess my question remains as to what happened----Charlie invites him out last year and hears all that we heard today and I think pretty impressive -----the money raising is not that complicated as so many of these events are charity driven----however he starts off the interview with saying how he and Moncla and others are good friends---Did he ask them what happened to his status to drop off so much as to not be a finalist?? This is where things don't add up and maybe T got an answer off the air---Time as usual will spell out the answer!!!

[cajunhawk]

101 guests. Lets Half-ish that number-50 guests. There are 50 university employees reading this telling someone to say something? Ill even say half that, 25 university employees.

Why all the attention? It's not important. Not important enough to warrant anyone other than us small timers to pay attention. I know it benefits you to support the current administration...just like it works for Jay. Regardless...they are paying attention.

[CajunT]

No he's not.

Why didn't Mr. Hale submit references with his resume'?

And when was his resume' submitted?

Did somebody associated with this whole thing suggest he didn't have to worry about them?

Was that person in the position to suggest that?

Because he thought he was going to be given that opportunity in a official interview with the executive committee. I think this has been asked more then once on this forum and the answer is probably not to your satisfaction. I don't think the decision had anything to do with his qualifications, especially if the fundraiser will be answering directly to our AD and Mr. Blohm on the university side. But I will hold my final decision upon the announcement of the official hire and after the statements made by all involved.

[douglas]

i try to be a voice of reason on here. Anyone want to wait until we know who gets the job? This isn't a lifetime appointment, if he or she shows that they are incapable of the job then so be it.

This discussion reached epic absurdity when people started calling each other witches, the best part, i know these supposed "witches" and no offense to my witch posse...its hysterical that you would have any stroke on campus. Sorry,real talk, you are not powerful in any facet of life, but you already know this. i'll now bow out, who knows maybe ill log out and become and infamous guest.

[ManAboutTown]

I guess my question remains as to what happened

Charlie invites him out last year and hears all that we heard today and I think pretty impressive

-the money raising is not that complicated as so many of these events are charity driven

however he starts off the interview with saying how he and Moncla and others are good friends---Did he ask them what happened to his status to drop off so much as to not be a finalist?? This is where things don't add up and maybe T got an answer off the air---Time as usual will spell out the answer!!!

Still getting to the bottom of that specifically... But we think we're on to something.. Like
I said, more to come. And btw, my picture is my old golf bag with 2 buckets of balls on the range in Mt Pleasant, TX.

[douglas]

Why all the attention? It's not important. Not important enough to warrant anyone other than us small timers to pay attention. I know it benefits you to support the current administration...just like it works for Jay. Regardless...they are paying attention.

ill take the bait, do tell how i benefit

[ManAboutTown]

i try to be a voice of reason on here. Anyone want to wait until we know who gets the job? This isn't a lifetime appointment, if he or she shows that they are incapable of the job then so be it.

This discussion reached epic absurdity when people started calling each other witches, the best part, i know these supposed "witches" and no offense to my witch posse...its hysterical that you would have any stroke on campus. Sorry,real talk, you are not powerful in any facet of life, but you already know this. i'll now bow out, who knows maybe ill log out and become and infamous guest.

Not sure I follow.. Care to explain that a little more?

[douglas]

1. we have no idea who the finalists are. That info is and should be confidential to protect the 4 who don't get the job. Lets see who wins the fight, if he or she sucks fire em.

2. The "moles" "lackeys" "errand boys" claims are ridiculous, i know who you are referencing. ill give everyone the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to high emotions. But please stop with this witch hunt among ourselves, its silly.

[CajunT]

1. we have no idea who the finalists are. That info is and should be confidential to protect the 4 who don't get the job. Lets see who wins the fight, if he or she sucks fire em.

2. The "moles" "lackeys" "errand boys" claims are ridiculous, i know who you are referencing. ill give everyone the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to high emotions. But please stop with this witch hunt among ourselves, its silly.

That info has not been confidential to certain people outside the interview committee. How are resumes considered confidential when they were shown to people inside the athletic complex and to certain that support the administration?