Boomer I have stated my opinion on the CIT bid and frankly I don't give a damn about what you think one way or the other. I don't need to explain myself when there is a days worth of post on the subject had you bothered to go back and read them. Everyone has different opinions on the subject, in fact I received a number of emails and text today from people that don't want to post their opinions because jerks like you are going to call them negative or simple minded. Not everyone agrees that it is an honor to play in the CIT, sorry its not unanimous. But once the ball is tipped off, none of them or I will be hoping for the Cajuns to lose. You can take that to the bank.
---So there you go with the jerks deal----can't you post without trying to knock someone for a different point of view---you would be laughed off at a debate--come on T you are better than this----now I did go back and look at the posts and pointed a bunch out in my last post to you on them---Again I didn't call anybody simple minded as you did----Nobody claimed it to be so much an honor as a chance to compete again as I said in my first post----And so nice of you that you will pull for the Cajuns in their game---T--we can agree to disagree and point out differences but please stop the verbal assaults----You are better than this I would hope!!!
Boomer, you have a habit of attacking anyone who disagrees with you but you fail to see that. Everything that is posted about this University that is factual but not a positive thing you react to like its personal. They are playing in the Tourney....Cajun T, Myself and many others who do not post don't see this as a reward....we hope they can win the whole thing.....Geaux Cajuns...end of story
I'm just going to point out that at no point in this thread has anyone who supports this tournament called It an honor or reward. But for some reason, the anti-tournament people have spent two days accusing or implying that that's how we feel about it.
There are three certainties in my life. Death, taxes, and being trolled on the internet by J1M.
According to one source redwoods reproduce asexualy, as well as by seeds. In ether case the redwood is over fifteen years prior to any reproduction. So this tourney has still not yet reached puberty.
Boomer what are the secondary sexual characteristics of the giant redwoods. I suggest transgender.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)