Thanks.
It's not like flipping a light switch. Virginia Tech and Florida State were doing a lot in academics for several decades, but nobody really noticed or respected them, until football took off.
It's slow going, it takes a lot of work and a lot attention to detail and a lot of patience. Rome wasn't built in a day. Every week or two, I hear something else, something we're doing new or better, somewhere that Teck and others are losing ground.
If your football program improves, you win more games. That year. If your academics improves (or the reverse... ), it may be a decade, maybe two, before your reputation catches up with you. (Which is one reason a lot of people value sports over academics, it gives quicker bragging rights.)
The one good thing that comes out of Boy Presidential trying to shut down higher ed is that it's hurting everyone else a lot more than it's hurting us. Tech is slipping and slipping, we're accelerating. When the national pundits recognize where we are in relation to Teck and even LSU in many areas, it will be fait accompli.
As for ULM, they most certainly can afford to stay in 1A.
They can't afford to COMPETE in 1A... Whether they read the writing on the wall and objectively weigh the pros and cons of 1A v 1AA, depends on them. It's not like ULM is Harvard. And for that matter, it's not like Harvard always makes such great decisions. If you pay attention, the Ivy League schools make bone-headed decisions all the time.
Oh, and they cheat at sports, too. But that's another topic.