Penn State

[Cajunrunner]

The Supreme Court will then say that this policy is restricting the athlete’s constitutional right to completely monetize and strike that down.

Well it's worth a shot.

Tell the athletes who don't like it to go pro. They obviously have no intention of "playing school".

[Cajunrunner]

Good idea..... they could try to even the playing field the old fashion way too, how about set a certain NIL threshhold and if you are above that you remain at 20 practice hours allowed or maybe go down to 15, and if below you get 25 or 30 hours. Could even sell it not as losing practice time but giving the NILers time to work on their craft...or even be sure they are enforcing the 20 hours to begin with, with all these "grad" students and online students meeting with the "analysts" all morning should probably count as practice time

Don't need all that unenforceable stuff. Just have a rule that they sit for a year. They can still make NIL at their new school. The booster who wants to pay them to transfer can pay them for an initial season where they don't play/perform, then pay them for the subsequent seasons where they do.

[Turbine]

Don't need all that unenforceable stuff. Just have a rule that they sit for a year. They can still make NIL at their new school. The booster who wants to pay them to transfer can pay them for an initial season where they don't play/perform, then pay them for the subsequent seasons where they do.

Currently, no-compete clauses are legal.

[CajunVic]

Currently, no-compete clauses are legal.

These, by their nature present difficulties with enforcement and if the Supreme Court sniffs they are being used to restrict a players NIL rights they will strike that down also.

What player in his right mind would agree to that anyhow

[Turbine]

These, by their nature present difficulties with enforcement and if the Supreme Court sniffs they are being used to restrict a players NIL rights they will strike that down also.

What player in his right mind would agree to that anyhow

You are symultainiously in the mind of the Supreme Court and high school recruits. Nice.

On right mind logic though, no player in his right mind would sign with a talent graveyard that has 5 4/5-star players (at his position) in front of him and 7 4/5-star players coming behind him.

Yet they do.

[CajunVic]

You are symultainiously in the mind of the Supreme Court and high school recruits. Nice.

On right mind logic though, no player in his right mind would sign with a talent graveyard that has 5 4/5-star players (at his position) in front of him and 7 4/5-star players coming behind him.

Yet they do.

You are proving my point.

[CajunNation]

The way to deal with NIL/Portal is to do the opposite of what the P4 wants. Most of them want dual threat QBs and Freakish TE/WRs. As a G6, if you have one of these on your roster, the NIL poachers will grab them. We know this very well, don't we? So, stop wasting money we don't have recruiting/developing these guys. It's a bad business plan for G6s.

Most P4 schools don't want to run Air Raid/Option offenses. Those G6 schools that recruit/develop players to run these types of offenses will be the norm very soon.

[Turbine]

You are proving my point.

Point: They sign to ride the bench and they will sign a no compete.

[CajunVic]

Point: They sign to ride the bench and they will sign a no compete.

It’s the opposite - they sign to ride the bench surely demanding something more by the little school will cause them more so to sign to ride the bench.

[MarlinMan3]

Don't need all that unenforceable stuff. Just have a rule that they sit for a year. They can still make NIL at their new school. The booster who wants to pay them to transfer can pay them for an initial season where they don't play/perform, then pay them for the subsequent seasons where they do.

I agreed with sitting out.... it is sad that such simple rules are deemed unenforceable, yet they were able to catch us loaning suit jackets for photos and travel