Here’s where this gets real interesting. The university says that the suit can’t have any university trademarks on it. Fair enough, it’s not made by the university.
Now say the suit gets made. And then you purchase an XXL football jersey and put it over the suit. Is that a problem? Is that different than someone wearing a jersey to a game?
I love his enthusiasm, but this was never going to happen. It was definitely the wrong name, and probably the wrong mascot too. UL is 100% right to distance itself from his mascot.
The failure from UL wasn’t what they did today. It was what they didn’t do over the last 10 years… which is come up with a damn mascot.
This situation gives UL a golden opportunity to right their wrong. If I’m UL, I’m thanking him for his passion, and then I’m asking him to be part of a new mascot selection committee tasked with creating a new mascot for the first home football game of 2025.
Albi the first spirit booster with off season duties.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)