That’s all well and good but doesn’t matter. The facts are that the system was broken long ago when players weren’t allowed to use their actual name image and likeness, which every other student was allowed to do. This outcome was always guaranteed to happen when college athletics became an arms race and things aren’t going back.
It can either be accepted or quit watching.
Let’s remove universities from the equation when it comes to NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals. Instead, NIL contracts should be offered to athletes before they commit to a university, based solely on their earning potential. These contracts could be structured as four-year agreements with clear expectations and deliverables.
This approach allows athletes to choose their university freely while covering their own tuition—just like other students.
As an older student, this disparity doesn’t impact me as much. However, it’s disheartening to see students working minimum-wage jobs, scraping by on limited resources to pay for tuition, while some “student-athletes” already making millions have their tuition completely covered. In many ways, those funds are indirectly supported by the same struggling students. It’s a tough reality that feels deeply unfair to many hardworking individuals.
Screenshot 2025-01-02 094604.png
Not sure if this was posted.
Don’t know if this one made it here either.
I don’t disagree with you or anyone else about nil. I just view things different in that the idea of a student athlete has always been a charade. It’s just much more in the open now.
I have thoughts on what could fix it but I doubt those things ever happen so I’ve stopped worrying about it. I won’t personally donate to NIL collectives and if NIL iw why we can’t compete going forward, I’ll just enjoy more of MLB.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)