I only play the lottery when it reaches 1 billion. I’d like to give a chunk to UL athletics if we win, but would have one caveat which would probably kill the deal…RCAF autonomy.
I am not sure that the East Side sunshine is the only problem, or even the biggest. For me, personally, the biggest issue is that I am being asked to move to seats inferior to what I now have, at an unknown price, and with no guarantee of any price or even opportunity to return to seating comparable to what I have had for many years once construction is complete.
I refuse to pay the same amount for end zone or east side seats as I have been paying for 50 yard line chairback seats; especially if I have no price guarantee and no opportunity guarantee to regain my current seating.
Contrary to the University's belief, it is not entitled to any of my money, nor that of any other fan. It must earn that money EVERY YEAR by treating all of us with respect and transparency. Every person who is being displaced should receive from the University a guaranteed opportunity [at a guaranteed price, including the required RCAF donation, the premium required to purchase his seats and the actual ticket cost] to return to the seating he is being displaced from BEFORE he is asked to buy his displaced seats for this coming season.
Very good post and I agree 100%, but I don't understand the need for reseating for next year. All seating should be general admission with GA prices, and the department should focus on reseating for '25. If you want 50 yard lines seats next year just show up 30 minutes before kick, no problem.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)