Ooooh....didn't think of that scenario! That's the one we want!
How would it be beneficial to have Louisiana play in this scenario. You can make the argument that App beats Coastal so the game is played here, but after that, it seems we want an opponent with as few losses as possible.
How would it be beneficial to have Louisiana play in this scenario. You can make the argument that App beats Coastal so the game is played here, but after that, it seems we want an opponent with as few losses as possible.
No, I want to beat Coastal for the championship....a game that should have been played last year. We already beat App, badly. What does beating them again do for us?
No, I want to beat Coastal for the championship....a game that should have been played last year. We already beat App, badly. What does beating them again do for us?
How would it be beneficial to have Louisiana play in this scenario. You can make the argument that App beats Coastal so the game is played here, but after that, it seems we want an opponent with as few losses as possible.
I actually want App to win on Wednesday. Then have App drop another game to GaSo or someone.
Thus giving us Coastal at home.
But then Coastal would likely still host as the highest ranked SBC team in the CFP. Don’t put our chances to host into the hands of a committee ranking teams.
But then Coastal would likely still host as the highest ranked SBC team in the CFP. Don’t put our chances to host into the hands of a committee ranking teams.
No we would be undefeated and they would have a loss. So we would host.
But then Coastal would likely still host as the highest ranked SBC team in the CFP. Don’t put our chances to host into the hands of a committee ranking teams.
This would come into play only if we lose one of our remaining conference games. We run out we host with a CC loss to App.