I would imagine assistant pools for teams will go up a little bit given the recent change of having the 10th assistant.
When we're able to prove on the field that our superior coaches, facilities, and athletes have put us on a different level than Tech, I'll celebrate. Until then, I refuse to anoint another coach as the next coming of Saban.
Four New Orleans Bowl wins in four years will not accomplish this. If bowl wins meant what they used to, we'd have left LaTech eating our dust four five years ago. What we need our new staff to deliver are conference championships, signature wins over P5 opponents, and consistent wins over in-state competition.
Still, all signs point to this being a very good hire and a very good move in the right direction.
Where in my post did I appoint anyone anything? The purpose was to give perspective to the monumental nature of our recent commitment to finally establish a real program. This is the first step. The actual results will hopefully follow. If they don't, nobody can use resources as an excuse. Money is not the only thing. But it's definitely a thing. And we have now covered that base.
I love the direction and commitment that Dr. Savoie & Dr. Maggard are taking our program. Ultimately, the hiring of Coach Napier will be judged on wins and losses and wins and losses alone!
I am cautiously very optimistic.
Winning combination:
A: Money, lots of money well spent
B: Tradition, you simply have to have a great tradition. Without it you’re climbing a mountain, thus money for mountain climbing equipment.
C: Great coaches, again money well spent. Coaches get the best players and know how to use them.
D: Great AD, and administration. Without them you end up like Tennessee.
our coordinators will make more than 225. Will Hall was making in that range. Sale is making 350 at AZ St.
Don't think he's taking a pay cut.
And, if Napier keeps more than one assistant, I'll be surprised.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)