I'm with your thinking, but .... In the history of the SBC being regular season champions isn't nearly as important as luck. The regular season champions aren't often tournament champions. It's almost as if we'd do better to send the regular season champions and not have a tournament.
If we’d do this we might actually require better from our head coach than three games in March.
Forget the immediate result of being conference champs. Forget what "it gets you". Its about building a winning tradition and with that comes consistency in success. When that pattern is built, the end results will follow. If you win a conference title but lose in the conference tourney to a hot team, you still likely had a good season and get to hang that championship banner.
You want to be able to schedule better? You want to be able to get those good programs to maybe travel to your place and pack that house? I'd say there's a better chance of doing it with a program that isn't a SOS killer for good teams even if they win. Teams like VCU, Creighton and Wichita State come to mind. They weren't born in great conferences but they made a name for dominating their conference title picture and going to the dance.
Totally agree.
I was pretty disappointed with how fast they lost their lead against McNeese. We need to be able to finish off teams after building such big leads. If they can stop the slow starts, reduce the unneccessary three's, and keep leads, my expectations will go up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)