Give me 20+ wins, conference tourney champs over a regular season championship. Sunbelt is not a 2 team league.
Give me 20+ wins, conference tourney champs over a regular season championship. Sunbelt is not a 2 team league.
So no mutiny from Lee recruits, a back stabbing coach he hired whose never had a public problem with any other program he’s been associated with.
All his problems were self inflicted by his choice of players, and coaches he alleges were cancerous. Curious and curiouser for sure.
Also his claims of AAU disputes. It turns out that in basketball the AAU teams are where the best talent are. You’ve got to find a way to coexist with them. If you don’t you’re fighting a sunami. Just this week the NBA commissioner said exactly that about where the best amateur talent is. He said the vast majority of quality players are not in high school, but AAU.
Bob can pretend he’s the good guy, but if the tables crooked you get out the game, or learn to deal with it. We’re not accepting cheating, or mediocrity.
We really won't know what type of team we have until a few games into conference play. I don't think we can rely on past performance in this case to make a prediction on this year's team. After all we have never had three transfers from P5 programs being significant contributors. I have no idea how we will do in conference other than to say I expect us to win more than we will lose and that is obviously not good enough to satisfy expectations. It appears we do have some talent but our guard depth is a concern. It is up to the staff to manage that situation and they know it.
With EP playing in the Association, & having former players playing overseas along with the D league Marlin is benefiting from that with possible recruits.
Having P5 transfers isn’t an indicatior of anything one way or the other. We’ve had lots of players better than P5 players, especially P5 role players who didn’t work out. It only means they were better prospects coming out of high school.
As an example Gant looks really good, but I think too thin as a P5 forward. He was being schooled by McNeese 31 last night. He’d not be a solid P5 starting forward IMO, but he’s going to be all SBC 1st,2nd, or 3rd team.
I’m damed glad we got him though.
Again, you guys want to oversimplify this as if you have to have only one over the other. Why? If you are not focusing on winning conference titles I don't want you as a coach. That should be the primary goal. That is the primary step in building a program. With that comes conference tourney wins and NCAA tourney invites. Again, what is the benefit of going to the tourney if the chances of winning are slim to none? You play the whole season for 4 games in March? That doesn't build programs or prestige. Our goal has been to go to the dance for 7 years now, this much is admitted by Marlin, and we've been to one NCAA tournament.
I've seen plenty of P5 forwards that are thinner than Gant. Have you watched Kentucky play this year? They have guys of that frame. When you can play you can play, especially today where the game is called much closer eliminating all the physical play that would make a thicker guy have the advantage.
I'm not saying that he would benefit from bulking up a bit but that's not what's keeping him out of P5. He is more of a tweener. He has the frame of a 3 but the game of a 4 or 5.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)