There are literally tens of thousands of qualified interchangeable oil and gas E & P professionals. Apples and oranges. You can count Robe's replacements on one hand, maybe. Robe is so far underpaid, it is simply ridiculous to assert otherwise. Quit being silly. Macroeconomics goes out the window with a supply too small to measure.
Here’s the reality. If Robe died tomorrow we’d be paying his successor way more, unless it’s Babineaux, with a hometown discount. Or we’d be expecting to complete at a much lower level. In any case probably going to happen sooner than we’d like.
He may be underpaid compared to the P5s of the world....but please forgive me if I don't feel sorry for a man making a minimum of $150k/year with a lot of perks (cars, phone, etc), an additional $30k annually contributed to interest bearing annuity account.....oh yeah, and he doesn't have to worry about 401k contributions cutting into his take home pay b/c he will receive 100% of his salary until he quits breathing...he's not shopping at Great Value...
If Robe "retired tomorrow" would be a better reality.....
![]()
This is why you are incorrect. It is not about how you, or I feel about it that matters. What matters is his market value. He deserves it whether you, or I like it, or not. The salary comp is Coach Glasco and it is now established. It simply, now looks cheap to not pay Robe his market value.
If Robe was 30 years old getting his first head coaching job, then his comp would be somewhere else.
You are correct in that there are many more O&G professionals than high end baseball coaches...but the point remains the same...if he is not willing to pack his things and move to LSU or South Carolina or Florida or wherever... he's getting what we can offer: a fair deal for him and us... as a small program on a limited income.... I think we, as in the school and the fan base, are giving him WAY MORE than he would receive at majority of programs across the country... and I don't imply that to mean just salary (fan support, etc.)...
well we can cross that bridge when we get to it....all I can go off of is facts...the facts from his 20+ year tenure here can only be 1 of the following.....he's been a)unwilling to move and therefore willing to accept the discounted salary he's been receiving.. or b) he's been open and willing to move/chase the money, which if that's the case, why hasn't he left?...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)