2017 FB: Louisiana 22, Ole Miss 50

[31Ragin97]

This isn't a normal review though. No other review is allowed to kick a player out. Is there even another review for the assessment of a penalty in college football?

Good point, i am not informed on this topic, sorry.

But i dont think sec officials have a problem of "not calling it enough"

But it sounds like he is already kicked out, and the review has chance to put him back in?

I do find it odd the player has to be escorted off the field immediately, into the locker room. Is he really a threat from the sideline? If fouled out in basketball and no arguing you can stay on bench

[CajunEXPRESS]

If a call is confirmed, evidence is there to confirm it’s right. When allowed to stand there isn’t enough evidence to make a call. Clearly if there’s no evidence to change a target call , it should stand.

[LouisianaB]

If a call is confirmed, evidence is there to confirm it’s right. When allowed to stand there isn’t enough evidence to make a call. Clearly if there’s no evidence to change a target call , it should stand.

Or since it imposes a penalty, it should have to be confirmed. Like I said, is there any other review where a penalty could be assessed?

I’m just saying my opinion.

[CajunEXPRESS]

Okay I’d like our guy not to have a target penalty. But I think it’s crazy to require a confirmation regardless of consequences. I’m pretty much sick of the camera in about 15% of calls.