The issue in which I'm attempting to ponder revolves around an individual who "allegedly" received illegal benefits from a college coach who was "positively" seeking this indiviual to become an active part of his organization...The individual claims that he identified actions presumed to be inappropriate...but yet he willing engaged in this same conduct. Absent the manifestation of any detrimental consequences which resulted from partaking in the "alleged" inapropriate conduct....this individual blows the whistle....as if there was some devine intervention requesting his disclosure!Originally Posted by Clutch0364
Even if the coach was per say "Cheating" ....the accuser was a co-conspirator....Thus, absent an angelic encounter...coupled with threats of sending this individual to hell unless he confessed his sins of taking part in inappropriate conduct with a college coach....His actions can only be deemed as MALICIOUS!
I geuss in simple english....I'm just curious of his motive...regardless of whether his claims are baseless or not!![]()