Hammer,it's part of the legacy Doc has left us with. Remember, Baldwin is his hire and not Nelson S. decision.
Hammer,it's part of the legacy Doc has left us with. Remember, Baldwin is his hire and not Nelson S. decision.
Baldwin is!!!!!! A preacher that(not that there was ANY wrong doing) teaches his congregation to NOT turn the other cheek!!! What a holy man!!!
Baton Rouge where Baldwin coached and case was held!
Baton Rouge where Southern and LSU have been at it for years(the great divide)!!
Baton Rouge the great ULL sayers, USL callers, Lafayette turn there noses to us HATERS(not all but they are out there in numbers)
For those who served on a jury before, it is ALL too common for there to be a few strong personalities. If these personalities can get the just of either of the attourneys then they can swing the others in the jury.
Oates if he does not win the appeal would never take on a case for me I can assure you of this.
DaddyCajun
This WILL be appealed, and there will be NO Jury who can be swayed by emotion or feelings.
Let me try and shed some light on some things.
This suit was originally thrown out by the same judge who heard this case. On appeal, it was reinstated to state court with the appeals court stating that a jury should hear it.
The jury was made up of six men and six women, six white and six black.
The jury, for the most part, knew nothing about sports.
There's no question that emotion, not facts, played the biggest role in the jury's decision. They found the University liable for breach of contract as well as racial discrimination.
Nelson was named personally in the lawsuit as well and as a result, is personally liable.
When you appeal something like this, only the facts mean anything. I am confident that JB will never see this kind of money.
If the decision is upheld, NS is personally at risk.
The University's assets are immune from seizure because it is a state agency. In other words, the typical debt collection tactics that you would employ to enforce a judgment are useless against the State.
There is little Baldwin can do to compel the university to pay up.
He shouldn't get a dime.
If someone turns in a well below average performance at work over a three year period, they should be fired.....ESPECIALLY when they leave the job/program significantly worse off than where they found it. This should be true, whether they are white, black, yellow, purple or green.
This seems like common sense to me, but what do I know?
What a travesty!! The university does not deserve this, nor the community, supporters, and fans of UL athletics. This kind of frivilous jurisprudence continues to jeopardize the athletic departments around the country and sends the wrong message to aspiring departments about hiring minorities. We now have set a precedent. Hire a minority with no accounability to improving and making financially stable a football program at risk and the universities, administration, and taxpayers become viable targets for punitive actions.
The die has been cast, the gauntlet run, the verdict passed. Let's all learn and move on. This is a black-eye (no pun) on UL and its un-dying supporters as well as all the fine minority coaches in college football that work hard everyday to build character and excellence in the young men they have cradled.
So much for bringing lawsuits against one's own brothers from the Christian perspective. This is indeed a SAD, SAD day.
Good Luck to the UL athletic programs!!
No argument there.
And Stevie P clarified something for me this morning. The university did negotiate a TV and radio coach's show for JB. It was cancelled after year 2 because of lack of sponsor support due to the poor record and lack of interest. The sponsors, according to Stevie P, basically made a business decision that the return on the coach's show was not worth the investment. Maybe JB should have included the sponsors in his suit and labelled them racists also.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)