We are going to beat OHIO.
The MIGHTY RAGIN CAJUN STEAMROLLING ZONE OPTION FREAK SHOW is in town.
Resistance is futile.
We are going to beat OHIO.
The MIGHTY RAGIN CAJUN STEAMROLLING ZONE OPTION FREAK SHOW is in town.
Resistance is futile.
On one of those trips we had something to show for it...another of the official's making up to Spurrier with a holding penalty. We go up the middle, score and get called for holding? Give me a break!!
In today's football enviroment you could call holding on every play. When there is an obvious late hit out of bounds by SC, the official(??) is standing nearby and there is no call, well......??
Then to top of my P.O.'d mood I read in the Advocate this quote by Spurrier, "Now we know we are a bunch of average stiffs and we will have an average year if we don't play better. So maybe this was good for us." WHAT A PUTDOWN ON THE CAJUNS!!Could it be that the Cajuns made them look average? If I were Spurrier I would throw a few kudos at the officials(??).
That's just Steve Spurrier for you. He's always been that way. Does anybody have any final stat lines for guys? I wasn't able to watch most of the game, just caught some highlights. I know we severely outrushed them. But that's about it.
The Positives--
-Dez proved that he can play the QB position effectively and provide veteran leadership in that role.
-The 3 headed running game of Des, Fenroy, and Wallace is unstopable when it clicked in the first game.
-Oline for being young looked good, and created good holes for the RB's to work with
-Defensive Backfield (our achilles heal on defense last year) Had flashes last night with an interception (we almost forgot what those were like last year) and a few batted balls and one that should have been an INT. Overall, appears to be the MOST improved part of the team.
The Negatives -
-The ability to throw the ball down the field is what will ultimately take this team to the next level. The intermediate pass routes are nice, but we need to be able to go downfield as we did on the play to Derrick Smith down to the 2 yard line (on 3rd an 25 I think it was).
-The defensive backs played well, but can only do so much if the Dline and LB's dont get more pressure in the QB's face. I look for a better pass rush next weekend.
-3rd down and long Defense, I saw it again last night, Just like we did last year. We CANNOT allow this many 3rd and long conversions. After such plays, the players look deflated almost every time a strong drive will ensue.
The Inbetweens -
-The WR's showed flashes of improvement, but didn't legitimately have a shot to show true improvement as all pass plays were for very short gains. The positive was when they were thrown to them, they caught. The unknown comes from being able to say for sure if they have the ability to be a home run threat.
The Tuffguy random thought goes to...
"Where the heck did USC find a kid that can kick 1000 yard, every single kickoff was 5 yards deep even after they moved the ball back!"
Tuffguy
Agree with all of your assessments especially the point of 3rd and long and giving it up too often. Reminded me of last year.
Overall game was very competitive. A break here or there and we could have got a W.
On to the Ohio Bobcats.
Ps- Wonder what the Michigan Boards are discussing this am.
CC
Anyone who comments on precisely what happened would be correct. As to an evaluation... for the first game of the season, away, at an SEC opponent... every single aspect of our performance was extremely good. I was overwhelmingly pleased. Overwhelmingly pleased. Any doubt about new coaches, new starting QB, only having a running game, so on and so forth, were completely dispelled. We even executed the short sure pass routes correctly and successfully. You do not make an assessment of a downfield passing game based on your first game, against an SEC defense, away, and with a QB that is just getting his hands on the controls.
Everything from here on out will be a challenge, but I see no reason for excuses or prognostications of doom. Overwhemingly pleased.
If my assessment of the game is taken as doom and gloom, dont. Its just observations at the game that we played very well in. If our "down and distance" and "Dline and Linebacker QB pressure" are some of our only negatives, then we're in MUCH better shape than anyone thought. The things I quoted are most likily the exact things that the coaches saw and will work on this week. I think next week we will see more down the field passes and I think they will work, I just think we could have done it yesterday as well.
Take it easy
Again, our DBs blow assignments. Our D line and LB's did a pretty good job of stopping the run. minus zanders and #47. We lost several big plays to them being out of position. I'd like to see our Dline get a little more pressure in passing situations. anywho, we gave them the first two touchdowns bc of field position. but the two blown assignments by db's cost us 14 points. as far as fenroy goes, he's a beast. mike d. is a warrior. however, the fact that we can drive the ball 70+ yards and get stuffed inside the 10 twice is humiliating. there is no one to blame here but the play callers. but, the fact that we could hang with one of the toughest teams on our schedule was impressive. I strongly believe we can pull out a conference title. Go UL
Whoa there!! Check the timestamp on my post ..it was after their first TD drive . But a pretty good game by the Cajuns , i thought it would be a patented Spurrier run up the score game ...but we hung in there and couple of conversions in the end zone and things would've been really interesting .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)