I made a mistake counting down the rankings and did not account for the Cajuns falling below themselves ... the Cajuns would have finished #14 ... just ahead of Georgia. But this is immaterial to the seeding.
The committee did not arbitrarily move us down a couple of spots. I fully understand why Missouri was moved ahead of the Cajuns ... I just do not agree with it. You need to look at the teams that would have been vying for those last few #1 seeds. You also need to understand that there was a large gap between the Cajuns and the #16 spot ... and another significant gap with the #18 -> #20 spots.
Looking at the teams and the way the committee made their selections, I think the Cajuns at a #14 RPI rank would have been a #15 seed ... ahead of Washington at #16.
There is a big difference between taking a team that has a Top 16 RPI and not making them a #1 seed and seeding a team a few positions down from their RPI. No way do I think the Cajuns at #14 would have fallen out of the Top 16 seedings. That would have required Washington (substantially weaker RPI ... remember the committee also sees the RPI numbers, not just the rankings) and someone like Florida State to pass them. Florida State being left out made complete sense because they did not have the resume and finished weak.
Brian