I believe it is entirely appropriate to review the contributions of Rickey Bustle and include numerous complimentary remarks. He is a very good person and a good football coach. The circumstances perhaps as much or more than his own abilities may be dictating the necessity of the end of his career at UL. Regardless of which side of that argument you land, it is nonetheless highly necessary that we act with our heads in this case moreso than our hearts. Let the lovers love the next guy too.
Even if someone could argue that Bustle is an outstanding head football coach... when you labor for 9 seasons with an FBS ranking (just one measuring stick of success) of unspectacular proportions, in the world of college football, you must seek new means to find greater success. Has the university done everything it needs to do? Have the fans done their part? Not yet. But that is another requirement of the new mission.
I am a strong advocate of using the mission formula that I know works. You must take one of the most visible contributing factors, the coach, and push a tremendous responsibility... including a hefty pricetag... on their head. I consider him being of fine character and his student-athletes going to class and behaving properly a non-negotiable requirement of the entire school. If it even has to be discussed more than once, there are issues at the school that transcend the coach. The maintenance supervisor had better focus on maintenance and the football coach better be focused on winning football games.
I consider the discussion of the "character of a coach" equivalent to a any other position at UL. Have we done a great background and morality check on every professor at UL? Is it acceptable that one that teaches Philosophy, English or Music is a great teacher, but is an oddball character-wise?
I look at a professor of Computer Science and say "can he teach me what I'm here to learn?". He can be a geek who wears a dress on the weekends for all I care. And as far as the football coach goes... I very much hope his main vocation is coaching football. If he's a sweetheart guy in the process... so be it. Personally, I will keep an eye on his coaching and that is where he will get 98% of the weight of his grade from me.
On Stokley's end of career . . . Other similarities; both have an NFL receiver on the roster and neither survives coaching heir son. Unless you can count 2-9 as surviving.
I don't know if Stokley had talent or not in 1998 I know he had one year where he went from 2 wins to 8 wins. Did he go from no talent to full talent in one year?
UL needs a coach who can think fast, that is the number one asset a coach can bring to the field on game day.
jmo
Geaux Cajuns
The athletic department has a list of prospective coaches in all sports. They do this in order to expedite the hiring process in order to not take a catastrophic hit in recruiting.
They have a list for football, m&w basketball, baseball, and softball too. It is always good to have a short list of guys that meet the search criteria just in case.
I also believe that prior to the season starting the administration had informed Coach Bustle that it would take a winning season or bowl game in order to be retained as HC. As soon as those two goal were no longer attainable the search process started IMO. If that is the case, which I think it is, the athletic department has been gauging interest from potential candidates and began to vet them against their search criteria. I would think that it is safe to say the athletic department has 7 or 8 candidates already lined up to formally interview beginning next Tuesday.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)