Again, only a person like you would think that.
Rory has a very solid podcast, with great facts, has never ruffled a feather and can't get his friend on to talk about the program they both know and love. It has nothing to do with trust, reputation or anything else. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Pods will vary in approaches. Some will be more aggressive, some milk toast like FB (no negativity allowed), some middle of the road, some way out there.
All depends on the personalities involved, objectives, career aspirations and such.
For example, if someone wants a career in “the media”, they’re not going to dump on any athletic program simply one never knows where a big gig may lead someone.
If the above isn’t an objective, varying approaches defines the pod. Approaches from Bobcat Goalwaith to a priest’s homily exists.
They’re all good, and if a person doesn’t like a particular approach, nobody says one has to listen. Same goes for guests, they don’t like a host’s approach, they don’t have to appear.
If you want to look at our peers: USM has multiple podcasts that have interviewed all major sport coaches. App St has two pods that have talked to all of their coaches. ODU has a weekly basketball show with their head basketball coach. They also interviewed their head baseball coach (pretty sure it was baseball) on their SECOND EVER episode. Troy has multiple that have talked to Sumerall. Houston and Memphis the same. I can go on..
Podcasting is the future and keeping coaches off of local podcasts will set programs (with a blanket "NO" policy) further and further back
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)