So the QB decision has made itself.

[CajunStros]

I thought Ben’s scrambling last night made us less one dimensional and went a long way towards changing and winning the game for us. Does Chandler make those runs?

Not likely. Can he run? Sure. Is he as effective as Ben at running? No and it’s not close.

[Bandwagon King]

Do you really think a coach provided you with every single reason for making a player choice? If so, I have some beach front property in Arizona I would like to sell you.

I have not petitioned for one QB or another here.

All I said is that history has a way of repeating itself. If it does, you will find Chandler as the QB again this season. If not, maybe it will be Ben all the way to the end.

Don't get defensive about providing a solution which allows Ben to retain the starting position unless he shows on the field why he was initially No. 2.

Back in the day when I didn't hate you quite so much for being a never ending rotten little troll, and the idiots on the game day page that would type every other post about replacing Levy with Chandler & you defended the obvious. I was like I'm glad someone else is doing this so I don't have to. Because you were right in defending one of the three greatest QBs in the history of the school against moronic futility.

Now you are just pecking as you usually do, to hear yourself peck on a keyboard. The only reason Chandler got the starting job over Ben is obvious. Ben is a transfer & Chandler has been here & INHERITED the job. If Mike felt so good about Chandler to begin with, he wouldn't have gone to a two QB system to begin with. He wouldn't have even accepted Ben's application to play here. And as time goes on it becomes more & more apparent who the better player is. Is Chandler capable of starting. He can come in & start if Ben gets hurt, but we won't be going anywhere very fast. If you don't see the difference in athleticism, confidence, leadership, connection with his receivers then you aren't a very good observationist. You're just a troll trying to get a response.

[CajunVic]

Back in the day when I didn't hate you quite so much for being a never ending rotten little troll, and the idiots on the game day page that would type every other post about replacing Levy with Chandler & you defended the obvious. I was like I'm glad someone else is doing this so I don't have to. Because you were right in defending one of the three greatest QBs in the history of the school against moronic futility.

Now you are just pecking as you usually do, to hear yourself peck on a keyboard. The only reason Chandler got the starting job over Ben is obvious. Ben is a transfer & Chandler has been here & INHERITED the job. If Mike felt so good about Chandler to begin with, he wouldn't have gone to a two QB system to begin with. He wouldn't have even accepted Ben's application to play here. And as time goes on it becomes more & more apparent who the better player is. Is Chandler capable of starting. He can come in & start if Ben gets hurt, but we won't be going anywhere very fast. If you don't see the difference in athleticism, confidence, leadership, connection with his receivers then you aren't a very good observationist. You're just a troll trying to get a response.

Quit writing books about me . . . you are self defeating your position.

I stand by my analysis. At least it is based upon known facts as opposed to rank speculation as yours is.

[Million$Mullet]

Not likely. Can he run? Sure. Is he as effective as Ben at running? No and it’s not close.

This reminds me of someone before the season started saying that Ben was a statue in the pocket. Made me laugh then and I’m laughing even harder after Wednesday’s game.

[CharlieK]

Back in the day when I didn't hate you quite so much for being a never ending rotten little troll, and the idiots on the game day page that would type every other post about replacing Levy with Chandler & you defended the obvious. I was like I'm glad someone else is doing this so I don't have to. Because you were right in defending one of the three greatest QBs in the history of the school against moronic futility.

Now you are just pecking as you usually do, to hear yourself peck on a keyboard. The only reason Chandler got the starting job over Ben is obvious. Ben is a transfer & Chandler has been here & INHERITED the job. If Mike felt so good about Chandler to begin with, he wouldn't have gone to a two QB system to begin with. He wouldn't have even accepted Ben's application to play here. And as time goes on it becomes more & more apparent who the better player is. Is Chandler capable of starting. He can come in & start if Ben gets hurt, but we won't be going anywhere very fast. If you don't see the difference in athleticism, confidence, leadership, connection with his receivers then you aren't a very good observationist. You're just a troll trying to get a response.

Dude are you retired or something? How do you have so much time to write endless books on thread after thread? Jesus.

[CajunVic]

Dude are you retired or something? How do you have so much time to write endless books on thread after thread? Jesus.

BAD Books at that . . .

[Cajun Monkee]

Prior to this season, a (big) piece of me wondered if Ben might get the starting job due to timing.

The big question is will Zeon be the future? I wondered if Ben would get the starting job, we'd redshirt Zeon, next year Ben would be a senior and Zeon still only a freshman who might compete next year but definitely would be the frontrunner for 2024.

I've been a Chandler guy since he stepped onto campus but I just wonder if he is a much better throwing Brooks Haack? Not only does he seem a little slow in making the commitment to run, he just might be a step too slow.

Ben threw some sweet balls Wednesday. That end zone toss to Dontae was special. And his deep balls were more than adequate. I think Chandler would have had the same success throwing the ball but running? I just don't know.

I still think our record would be better if either of these cats had played entire games.

Mike just needs to make his decision on one or the other.

[Turbine]

BAD Books at that . . .

I prefered the days before you ran for cover (to cover) and told the truth with a simple "did not read."

[CajunVic]

I prefered the days before you ran for cover (to cover) and told the truth with a simple "did not read."

Read enough in the day to know that any amount of improvement would end with the same result . . . BAD Books . . .

[Turbine]

Read enough in the day to know that any amount of improvement would end with the same result . . . BAD Books . . .

Fair enough.

Just trying to help you avoid that "new knee" jerk, reaction.