According to the marketing director for the CD, they are just waiting on a start date
UL worked with LCG to study the 2 retention ponds. UL more or less determined they would not help reduce flooding.
https://thecurrentla.com/wp-content/...tion-Ponds.pdf
You have to be careful when looking at the studies. First, a model is constantly being modified and updated. The UL study was only one of the many "studies" done and from what I understand, not the only study used in determining what to do and where. First of all any study that is performed and used by a local government must be performed by a licensed engineer in practice. The UL study was done by a school which may or may not be done by a licensed engineer. I would not trust any opinion of any news media outlet relative to drainage because, to be honest, they don't know their butt from a whole in the ground.
But do you?
Honest question....Does the Cajundome get a cash infusion from UL or the State? Or are the majority of its revenues generated by events hosted by the Cajundome?
In this year's LCG budget, the Cajundome did get $600,000: $500,000 from the CITY of Lafayette's general fund and $100,000 from the CITY of Lafayette's capital fund.
And if the State doesn't contribute to the general O&M of the Cajundome, and the University doesn't contribute to the general O&M (and this distinguishes between revenues UL gets from the state as opposed to student tuitions and fees); and,
If you don't live in the CITY of Lafayette, your tax dollars don't go to the Cajundome.
Again, this is with the caveat that I don't know what role the State may play in providing funding to the Cajundome.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)