It's just splitting hairs at this point, but I think Auburn is a 3 seed with their OOC strength of schedule and their 9th place conference finish. We finished ahead of them in RPI, had a better non conference SOS, won the regular season and tournament.
It might be a wash unless we would have gotten like a mid major tournament winner as a 3 and we'd be a 2. Auburn would just be the home team, I guess.
We should be able to handle them. They should be in the same category as like an Illinois. Just my opinion.
If you go back, there are easier 3 seeds in some regionals. Sometimes. Last year we got the winners of the A-10, George Washington as a 3 seed in baton rouge. They had a good record, but it was their first NCAA appearance. They went 2 and out, also. I think anyone would take a George Washington over an SEC team. We matched with McNeese as a 3 in 2017.
Then on the other hand, look at what we got to host in Lafayette in 2016. We got both Texas A and M and Texas as a 2 and 3. Both ranked in the top 25 at the end of the season. Both could have easily been 2 seeds elsewhere.
I think it matters. Sometimes.
I know a #2 seed looks better than a #3 seed on paper, but is there really any difference? As far as the regional works, if the #2 or #3 seed wins, they get the #1 seed (probably) in the next game and the looser gets the #4 seed (probably) in the next game in the looser's bracket. Loose game #1 and it becomes a difficult bracket having to win five games in a row to advance!
Once you are in the regional it matters not at all.
But and however... where you are seeded can affect which regional you are sent to.
It also affects who you face once you get out of the regional.
Sometimes being a 2 can burn you.
I like Louisiana's chances here.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)