While we certainly need to play high caliber teams don't buy into this "we need P5 teams for RPI". It absolutely helps but historically our RPI has been hurt for other reasons. P5 teams have an advantage because even the bottom end of the conference usually does okay OOC and have the rest of the conference to lift them up. Biggest thing we can do is limit exposure to the really bad W/L teams OOC. Playing a three game series against an historically bad team in a historically bad conference is way worse than not playing a game against the LSU's of the world.
I don't think this is 100% true, you definitely need some P5 teams, but we should be working with schools like James Madison, Liberty, Wichita State, UCF, Western Kentucky, Kennesaw State and others that are traditionally Top 50 RPI teams that should want to play against us.
I know it takes 2 to tango, but you would think these teams would like an RPI boost vs us and we could use the same, rather than playing Memphis or Buffalo or teams that completely destroy your RPI.
I know we took a hit with Houston, who traditionally is pretty good and had a season ending RPI of 130. But their are Top 50-75 RPI teams that we need to be working with that are not P5 teams.
This is absolutely not true unless you want to do brain dead scheduling. Then yes P5s will support you more often than not.
What is unacceptable is actually doing brain dead scheduling. Including a St. Peters, or a North Alabama, those types are a no no. If you go that route, then yeah, you need P5s to counter balence those mistakes.
What you would really need to do, is find programs that win and consistently win.
jmo
Let's compare apples to apples. Lamb was tired. She had just pitched 7 innings and was trying to give it a go with 45 minutes rest on a pretty warm day. The odds were high that she was going to give up hits in the 2nd game. In regards to Summer, she is a great pitcher and I don't know anything and I am not trying to start a rumor so please don't quote me here as me saying I know something because I don't but could there have possibly been some undisclosed underlying issue health wise that might have been in play with her and she tried to work through it? Now, to answer your question, if the pitcher is truly dominant pitcher and remains healthy for each contest, the advantage is always with the pitcher in my opinion no matter how many times a team faces said pitcher. You have to remember that just like hitters, elite pitchers are constantly working to improve their game. They are working on different spins, throwing from different angles, different speeds, etc. The hitter is always at the disadvantage because he/she is reacting to what the pitcher is throwing. I have been fortunate to talk at length with some of the best hitting instructors working today. Every one of them has said that the old adage "good pitching beats good hitting" is true but they placed the caveat 99% of the time on that statement because there is that elite 1% of hitters who will have more successes than failures against a dominant pitcher. The point of my original post was that as a team, at least at the college level in softball, you will not have enough good hitters to counter a truly dominant pitcher no matter how many times you see them in a season. You might be able to catch a dominant pitcher when they are having an off night or when they are trying to pitch through some type of issue like a muscle strain or a blister and then you can have multiple hitters have success against them (see above about Summer). There just aren't that many pitchers in the game right now like a Montana Fouts who can totally control a game from the circle. She makes up for the weaknesses in the lower part of Alabama's lineup and she dominates the weaknesses of the opposing teams bats. This is why every coach gladly offers up one of those ultra valuable and precious 12 athletic scholarships to a truly dominant pitcher.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)