Tulane Thwarts Cajuns' Rally, 9-6

[CajunVic]

And your position continues to be a poor one.

Your point last year was against 5 but not as much as it was against Robe.

Wrong again. Do that again and you will be approaching MAT and/or ZEPHER levels.

[Rougarou]

You fail to understand my position so surely you can’t posit upon it.

I understand it perfectly fine just as I did last year. Your position certainly shifted over time. Which is good.

And you are entitled to your opinion on my posts. It’s fine.

[Rougarou]

Wrong again. Do that again and you will be approaching MAT and/or ZEPHER levels.

Ok...

[CajunVic]

I understand it perfectly fine just as I did last year. Your position certainly shifted over time. Which is good.

And you are entitled to your opinion on my posts. It’s fine.

Wrong again.

Another ignorant post.

Now you are starting to sound like Schiff.

My position has remained 100% the same.

No shift at all.

[Dad04]

Plenty of solid ball players whose coaches manipulate things to get them into the Cape. Who then play extraordinarily well.

Robe sent few to the Cape. Those he sent deserved it and did well.

[Rougarou]

Robe sent few to the Cape. Those he sent deserved it and did well.

Absolutely. My post was very sarcastic.

[Dad04]

Last year 5 led the team for on base %, stolen bases by more than double, runs scored by a bunch, doubles, walks, sac bunts and never ground into a double play. The team was not very good, so all that gets devalued.

[Esqueleto]

As I stated earlier, I never advocated that 5 be benched. You are dead wrong about that. And again, your second sentence completely misses the point I made. You didn’t get it last year and won’t this year because all you are woried about is protecting 5 when my point is not against 5.

Thus, I maintain my position about the ignorance of your previous post.

Vic,I understand your point and agree with you on this one.

[CajunVic]

Last year 5 led the team for on base %, stolen bases by more than double, runs scored by a bunch, doubles, walks, sac bunts and never ground into a double play. The team was not very good, so all that gets devalued.

Your second sentence really devalues the first as he was tied with others on a team that was not very good in 3:of the categories posted. Also, you fail to note that he was second in SO's and lead in errors by almost double (15) putting him 23rd in fielding percentage, again, on a team that was not very good.

Attempting to pile on cuts both ways. Again, 5 is a good player, but it's hard to sit back and just take all the overhype. For once, I agree with MAT. What I have posted is not so much to rip but to note all of the factors that should be considered in evaluating a proclaimed 5 tool player. At the level that some on here want to promote 5, it is ALL relevant.

And I might add, two guys on this board that are believed to be baseball guys have declared their thoughts of who is the best hitter on a team that is currently hitting .151 and that you proclaim is not so good and 5's name was not in either one’s pick.

[Cajunrunner]

This thread took a complete nosedive and crashed. Looks like it’s time to move on to tonight’s game.