Let's get our funding methodology right and all else will follow.
Let's get our funding methodology right and all else will follow.
I agree that winning will solve a lot of problems. However, our identiy problem is the mixed message that the university athletic department sends out. We are referred to as primarily Louisiana Lafayette, but also as UL, Louisiana, Louisiana's Ragin Cajuns and Louisiana. Then, there is a statement about what NOT to call us. We continue to be referred to nationally and statewide (outside of Lafayette) as Louisiana Lafayette and ULL. Winning alone will not solve the identity problem.
When our athletic department says we are LU and Louisiana and that is all you should call us, that is what we will be called, period, whether we are winning or not. Currently, they will not use UL only because of the law. My point is to create that singular identity with LU if it will circumvent the law. UL will not and unless we get the law changed, this will be a long term continuing problem. Combine a singular identity that we want with winning and we have a "winning" combination.
I know the city of Lafayette is a drawing card, but its popularity might hamper promoting the external use of UL.
An upcoming game conversation often sounds like this; "Where is the game?" "Lafayette." That sounds normal and it is, unless you are trying to limit the use of the city tag nationally.
It might help if the conversation sounded like this; "Where is the game?" "UL"
jmo
Geaux Cajuns
UL is the best. It is our official name: The University of Louisiana. We're not Louisiana University. I liked ULA, but I could see that easily becoming ULaf on a scoreboard which is probably worse than ULL. UL is pretty much the default name which people call us by, except LSU people. In many publications I now see only UL, the one huge exception being the Advocate which I have a sneaking suspicion even adds the second L in direct quotes where it wasn't originally present. The only thing that will solve our name problem is continued growth in academics and much better athletic performance.
I think one thing that would help us become "Louisiana" is to drop the " 's " in Louisiana's Ragin Cajuns. While it may be unique, it only complicates things. Announcers and media outlets would probably call us Louisiana if our name was the Louisiana Ragin Cajuns, like the Michigan Wolverines or Texas Longhorns. Instead they are forced to consciously choose between saying Louisiana's Ragin Cajuns and Louisiana-Lafayette. "Louisiana's" just doesn't sound as natural. We've got to make things as simple as possible, because most people in the media aren't super bright.
As long as our administration focuses almost all of our marketing efforts on "Ragin Cajuns" and a flaming vegetable, the name issue will never be resolved.
true, but you present a false issue. someone earlier in this thread mentioned how the cajuns has just played "NU" and how great it was that everybody knows what that means. "NU" is the University of Nebraska--they switch it up a bit for NU, probably because something else is obviously known as the "UN." "OU" of the big 12? that school is the University of Oklahoma--they switch it around for their catchy acronym for whatever reason they chose. UL is, around the country, Louisville. There really is nobody known as "LU." You may not like LU, and frankly i don't much either, but the fact that the school is the university of louisiana at lafayette technically is not an impediment for trying it out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)