You have seen me state in the past that Boyd Nation's Pseudo RPI is close to the official RPI, but that there are some subtle differences. The differences begin to emerge more later in the season. This is because the differences are due to tie games (which Boyd does not include, but the NCAA does). To my knowledge, Boyd uses the same bonuses and penalties the NCAA uses ... though the determination of home/road/neutral games in regular season tournaments has been a topic of debate in the past (applied in situations where a bonus or penalty is being determined) .
Incidentally, the RPI I obtain from Paul Kislanko (SEBaseball.com) does include ties (and more precision in the RPI value). It seems to match the official RPI ordinal rank.
Regarding today's official NCAA RPI report for games through this past Sunday (5/2/10) , here are some minor differences in the ordinal RPI rankings ... which are due to differences in the RPI values themselves. Here, I look at only the Top 75 Adjusted RPI since this is the selection board the NCAA uses to commence the selection process (it will also place regular season champions on that board). To be consistent, I am using Boyd's pRPI publication from Monday morning (there were four NCAA Baseball games played Monday, which results in a slightly different RPI for Tuesday).
http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/weekly...10MBArpi1.html
Team (Official RPI, Boyd pRPI)
Clemson (13, 14)
South Carolina (14, 13)
LSU (18, 19)
Arizona (19, 18)
Stanford (38, 40)
Texas A&M (39, 38)
Appalachian State (40, 41)
The Citadel (41, 39)
Southeastern Louisiana (48, 49)
Washington (49, 48)
Western Carolina (52, 56)
Rutgers (53, 52)
Washington State (54, 53)
Georgia Southern (56, 54)
Kansas (59, 61)
Elon (61, 59)
Samford (65, 64)
Wichita State (64, 65)
Long Beach State (68, 67)
Middle Tennessee (70, 71)
North Carolina State (71, 70)
Florida International (72, 74)
James Madison (74, 72)
Brian