Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Printable View

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

April 15th, 2019, 03:26 pm
CrazyCajun

Quote:

Originally Posted by anhil8tor

Are these players on average the same quality of players we brought in the last four years? Would they perchance be better than what we have recently recruited?

Not sure about the unsigned but the ones In the article are putting up those numbers against tougher competition in better leagues. Not a knock against lsue they are a good program but they don’t play the toughest competition.
April 15th, 2019, 04:15 pm
Turbine

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by CajunRage

One is a top conference that gets more than half their conference in postseason. One is more times than not a multi-bid league. The SWAC is the first one bid league that came to mind. Does Southland make you feel better? My question is still the same.

I don't know, does the Southland provide competition that has a legit shot at a National Title in baseball?

Better yet, do they have a member with an Omaha ring?
April 15th, 2019, 04:20 pm
babysitter

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by talktomewillis

Some of you need to step away and take a deep breath.

I'm talking about those of you who call 35-21 ____ting the bed.

I'm talking about those of you who call a .600 winning percentage bad baseball.

That's what some of you have said about 2017-18. And, that's what the winning percentage was in those two years.

Regional good? No.

But if you think .600 ball is ____ting the bed and bad baseball, you need to get out more.

We've played some bad baseball this year. But guess what? We've played some bad baseball in the past, too. And,, we've always turned it around.

We will turn this around as well.

But get a hold of yourselves. We havent been ____ting the bed the last three years.

If you think playing .600 baseball at the college level is good then you need to find another job. Sorry to break that news to you. I mean really ? 35-21 is good ? That's a prime example of what I've said many times on this board. Mediocrity is totally cool over here. Very much accepted. And that's exactly why we are where we're at.
April 15th, 2019, 04:44 pm
CajunVic

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by babysitter

If you think playing .600 baseball at the college level is good then you need to find another job. Sorry to break that news to you. I mean really ? 35-21 is good ? That's a prime example of what I've said many times on this board. Mediocrity is totally cool over here. Very much accepted. And that's exactly why we are where we're at.

I’m not sure about this, but didn’t 35-21-1 put us Not far out of getting in the tournament in 2017?

Aren’t there about 300 D 1 teams and only 64 make it. I’m thinking .600 baseball is not far from the line.
April 15th, 2019, 04:57 pm
Rougarou

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by babysitter

If you think playing .600 baseball at the college level is good then you need to find another job. Sorry to break that news to you. I mean really ? 35-21 is good ? That's a prime example of what I've said many times on this board. Mediocrity is totally cool over here. Very much accepted. And that's exactly why we are where we're at.

I'd say it's good, not great. I don't think it is up to anyone's standards. I think the goal every year is to win 40. Realistically, we will not win 40 games every year. It doesn't matter who the coach is.

No one is okay with mediocrity. The difference in opinion on our forum seems to be to me that there are those that believe Robe is our best realistic option to meet our goals and those that do not believe Robe is the best realistic option.

I'm sure Duckman, you, and some others may feel I am a moron, but I still believe in Robe. This season is definitely testing my belief being that in my opinion it is worse than mediocre, but I still believe Robe is our best realistic option.
April 15th, 2019, 05:08 pm
Turbine

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by babysitter

If you think playing .600 baseball at the college level is good then you need to find another job. Sorry to break that news to you. I mean really ? 35-21 is good ? That's a prime example of what I've said many times on this board. Mediocrity is totally cool over here. Very much accepted. And that's exactly why we are where we're at.

35-21 is good ...

Except its not good enough for a perennially "good" team
April 15th, 2019, 06:18 pm
CajunEXPRESS

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

That ring wasn’t a SBC teams. Now if they win one this year you can drag out that text again. Weren’t they in their exiting year of the Big South? Regardless some other league.
April 15th, 2019, 06:33 pm
Turbine

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS

That ring wasn't a SBC teams. Now if they win one this year you can drag out that text again. Weren't they in their exiting year of the Big South? Regardless some other league.

You'll have to show me where I said it was.

The SEC touted any, and every, credential available when inviting Missouri, Arkansas and Texas A&M to be members. They went as far as saying their membership would improve competition.

Why would anyone claim the Sun Belt wasn't more competitive with the reigning national champion joining the conference?
April 15th, 2019, 06:43 pm
CajunEXPRESS

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbine

35-21 is good ...

Except its not good enough for a perennially "good" team

35/21 is a season no program should be satisfied with unless their schedule justifies an at large bid. Teams in the G5 will always need to get to 40 plus wins to have a chance for an at large.

If the university you support goals are to have a nice program that only hopes to occasionally win a conference tournament for a 4 seed that’s sad.
April 15th, 2019, 06:45 pm
Turbine

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS

35/21 is a season no program should be satisfied with unless their schedule justifies an at large bid. Teams in the G5 will always need to get to 40 plus wins to have a chance for an at large.

If the university you support goals are to have a nice program that only hopes to occasionally win a conference tournament for a 4 seed that’s sad.

Thanks, my posts have not touched the subject of tournaments. Only season records.
April 15th, 2019, 07:12 pm
CajunEXPRESS

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbine

You'll have to show me where I said it was.

The SEC touted any, and every, credential available when inviting Missouri, Arkansas and Texas A&M to be members. They went as far as saying their membership would improve competition.

Why would anyone claim the Sun Belt wasn't more competitive with the reigning national champion joining the conference?

I’m very happy to bring in a national champion. I’m not into false advertisement. Let’s get another championship.
April 15th, 2019, 07:15 pm
CajunEXPRESS

Re: Cajuns' JUCO signees having solid seasons

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbine

Thanks, my posts have not touched the subject of tournaments. Only season records.

Well again that’s not a very good season record. Regardless of your historical spot that’s not good. If you were terrible and turned it back to a .600 it’s a good start.

Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page