Hawk-
Your idea is good. But, the strategies don't have to be mutually exclusive. Also, why do you paint big donors as "power hungry?" I think it's reasonable that they can decide whether to donate to a certain venture based on its prospects.
If we were serious about bringing young alumni into the fold, there would be a young person on the RCAF board.
1) what has this administration done to attract big donors? Nothing
2) you are looking at it like its your big money, wealthy people can donate large amounts of money quicker than we can donate ours. They don't look at the amount like you or I, most of them are looking to "donate" to somewhere for tax purposes, you just have to give them a reason. There 100k is like our 1k, it won't make or break them.
3)your petition is valiant effort and I'd sign it, but I do t think it will have the effect you think it will, they know people are ____ed, they just don't care as long as the cronies of old that surround them keep giving them the atta boy. Why do you think anyone who has challenged their way of doing things has been gotten rid of?
When I give to the United Way, I don't tell them how to spend it.
Now, you can come back and say "yeah, but they have shown me a plan and I buy into it'. And that's it exactly. I didn't tell them if I wouldn't give them any money until they showed me a plan.
I get everybody's frustration AND I am very, very hopeful we are all soon to be overjoyed by a plan. But I have never felt threatening someone was the way to get their attention.
I am only speaking for myself but maybe a petition is a better solution; we need to show a force of unity.
Just my opinion; everybody's opinion is the right thing for them.
Well I am stunned. One guy says after thirty plus years of being fed bs he is near giving up, but will hang on as long as Hud is here, OR the administration actually do now what they say they will in the fuzzy future. So he is saying if you do none of the above I give up and will do other things with my money and time that I have left. That does not reek of lack or patience, or a threat.
Others say they are true believers. Well like they say a fool and his money are quickly parted.
Hawk, seems to say a lot of things, but mostly don't give up. I believe wants a mass petition signed.
I will sign said petition but that approach is really a form of being gullible. The protestors of the sixties did not sign petitions, they participated in marches, flop ins, sit downs, civil disobedience. I would love to see 16k students start having sit ins in front of Martin Hall, then I could tell T Joe my money will come when the sit ins are satisfied with the results.
Both my current options are non starters. Starve the program or fund lies and incompetence.
All I ask of the true believes is to trust after verification. Right now you are going to end up with a lot of promises and then the eventual excuses. I know, I know you want to believe them just ask what exactly have they done to garner such trust?
1...I agree...where have I said they are doing enough?
2...yes...but what's your point? You are saying people who have large amounts of money throw it at people willy-nilly for tax breaks? I work for a multi-millionaire personally. The guy is down to earth and knows where his money goes. But he doesn't just give out donations for tax breaks, he has his one favorite charity, and his church. That's it. So do the majority of big money people in Lafayette. Tax breaks...or the itemized deduction for donating cash, and non-cash items has a limit once your AGI goes over a certain limit. I am as sure as the day is long...those people have tax professionals who let them now when they are close or over their limit and any other donation is not deductible. And I am also 100% sure that these people already have their donations of choice long before the RCAF came about. So...again...what point are you trying to make? Are you saying it is easy to get large cash donations from unsuspecting Lafayette millionaires under the guise of tax breaks? If so...then why hasn't everyone figured this out, and started a 501-C organization and started bringing in the fat cheddar?
3. Good, I like to hear that people will sign it. You not only sign it...you are signing a declaration. The purpose of a petition is not just to group a whole bunch of people who have signed a paper, it is a group of people who have a message. If you wanted to threaten to remove RCAF donations from the majority of RCAF members, this would be the way to do it...not individually to the RCAF employees. I remember reading Slam Dunked that the university president did something that the fans did not agree with...they went to Martin Hall and forced to President to do what they wanted. Their is power in numbers. This is also the last straw...after an undertaking like this...if nothing came of it...then...we are ____ed six ways from Sunday. They cannot get rid of all of us...alone we are not powerful but united we are (I sound like Joan Baez) strong. The longer we wait the deeper the hole gets.
So after donating all these years to united way, if you stopped seeing commercials, stopped seeing them sponsor fund raisers and charity events.if you asked your children, grandchildren, friends and family about united way and they had no idea what you were talking about.... Would you still donate blindly without wondering where your money might be going?
My point is not every large money donor is some evil sneaky a-hole that just wants control of the athletic department. There are people that will donate large sums of money and do just that...donate it. They aren't gonna try to take t-Jose's house on campus or Scott's office. You just have to give them a reason. You are and have always made it sound like rich people are evil. Just as you or I don't expect to be able to control athletics with our donation there are wealthy people that see their donations the same.
What if the United Way takes your money and uses it for the exact opposite reason that you donated it for? That's an even better argument for withdrawing funds. To a lot of people this is what the RCAF and the administration is doing. You can't ask for your money back but you can cease donations. The difference is...the United Way will be alright...they survived the scandal of the 80's. The RCAF...might not be alright. That effects more than just the administration...it affects coaches, players, and athletic department staff that to us are doing far better jobs than the administration is. Why punish those people who have done nothing wrong?
I agree 100% with your idea that threatening someone is not the right way to get things done. Makes matters worse more often than not.
I really think that with the people we have here on RP (we are a gaggle of intelligent, stubborn, and passionate cajun men and women), we can get this done and really give the administration something to thing about.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)