Adapt or we will die

[CajunVic]

Well supreme court said no limits, those sound like limits

there will be no limits for those that can get more but at least most will get the same

[JamesTheJeweler]

. . . I don’t know anything about it other than the menial facts you provided . . .

You have 2 college degrees and you can't figure this out?

[CajunVic]

You have 2 college degrees and you can't figure this out?

. . . I would need a Jeanie or a mind reader . . . I can’t shat the facts . . .

[R1Letterman]

I don't think any NIL investor at our level gets anywhere close to a positive ROI on his money. In fact, the only ones I can think of offhand at ANY level who probably DO have a positive ROI are Livvie Dunne, who is insanely popular on social media, hence has millions of followers and many advertisers, and Caitlin Clark's sponsors [only because she has become a media and social media darling]. Of current NCAA athletes, I can think of none.

But what product makes her a positive roi to advertise? If she is making her own money based on posts/activity monitization that is different and not ROI that a company would see based on paying NIL

[Duggie35]

I don't think any NIL deal is made with an expectation of a ROI. Making an NIL deal is now simply a legal way of paying a player(s).

[Turbine]

I don't think any NIL deal is made with an expectation of a ROI. Making an NIL deal is now simply a legal way of paying a player(s).

Exactly

[USL]

$$$$ drives the world . . . NIL now drives the athletic world . . . have some or stay home

Guess I'll be "staying home." NIL not a priority in my budget.

[Turbine]

$$$$ drives the world . . . NIL now drives the athletic world . . . have some or stay home

Not an either or.

Nothing has changed.

[JamesTheJeweler]

I don't think any NIL deal is made with an expectation of a ROI. Making an NIL deal is now simply a legal way of paying a player(s).

That's exactly my point

[CajunVic]

That's exactly my point

Naivety running awry . . .