Page 17 of 18 FirstFirst ... 7 14 15 16 17 18 LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 180

Thread: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

  1. #161

    Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Quote Originally Posted by ManAboutTown View Post
    To each his own
    I don't want to get into an argument, but are you really convinced that a good coach can win consistently, even when the talent he has to work with is below that of his opponents on a regular basis?

  2. #162

    Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Every time Alabama plays LSU you see what happens when both teams have “similar talent” and only one of the teams has elite coaching


  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duggie35 View Post
    I don't want to get into an argument, but are you really convinced that a good coach can win consistently, even when the talent he has to work with is below that of his opponents on a regular basis?
    This question is a setup.
    Good coaching with inferior talent (not substantially inferior) has won in this league since its inception.

  4. #164

    Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Here is why no one will ever win this argument. Talent is very subjective. There is no argument that the top half of the SEC is more talented than any Sun Belt team. Now when comparing teams in the Sun Belt, that is a different story. Did Hud really have the talent we were sold he had? They looked like they should be talented, but I've seen guys at the grocery store that look like they should be talented and can't stop tripping over their two feet.

    Also, there are physical gifts and football talent. I think we had/have a majority of guys that tested great, but couldn't play football. So, yes they are talented, but aren't really D1 football players.


  5. #165
    Oiler's Avatar Oiler is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Fan for Sure

    Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Quote Originally Posted by Rainman66 View Post
    Here is why no one will ever win this argument. Talent is very subjective. There is no argument that the top half of the SEC is more talented than any Sun Belt team. Now when comparing teams in the Sun Belt, that is a different story. Did Hud really have the talent we were sold he had? They looked like they should be talented, but I've seen guys at the grocery store that look like they should be talented and can't stop tripping over their two feet.

    Also, there are physical gifts and football talent. I think we had/have a majority of guys that tested great, but couldn't play football. So, yes they are talented, but aren't really D1 football players.
    No doubt about it, we're a lower level G5 team this year with lower level talent. I think we're probably in the bottom 15 or so of all FBS teams, but you have to remember, we've only been playing football for 110 years or so. It's not like we've been at this as long as schools like UCF, USF, and FAU. It's sickening to me when I compare us to programs like these and what they've accomplished in just their first couple of decades of being in existence.

    UTSA will be the next program that leaves us in the dust. They had 46,000 in attendance against Texas State last week in San Antonio to watch two WINLESS teams square off. Imagine what the crowd would have been like if UTSA had a winning record.

  6. #166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oiler View Post
    No doubt about it, we're a lower level G5 team this year with lower level talent. I think we're probably in the bottom 15 or so of all FBS teams, but you have to remember, we've only been playing football for 110 years or so. It's not like we've been at this as long as schools like UCF, USF, and FAU. It's sickening to me when I compare us to programs like these and what they've accomplished in just their first couple of decades of being in existence.

    UTSA will be the next program that leaves us in the dust. They had 46,000 in attendance against Texas State last week in San Antonio to watch two WINLESS teams square off. Imagine what the crowd would have been like if UTSA had a winning record.
    29,205

  7. Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Quote Originally Posted by Oiler View Post
    No doubt about it, we're a lower level G5 team this year with lower level talent. I think we're probably in the bottom 15 or so of all FBS teams, but you have to remember, we've only been playing football for 110 years or so. It's not like we've been at this as long as schools like UCF, USF, and FAU. It's sickening to me when I compare us to programs like these and what they've accomplished in just their first couple of decades of being in existence.

    UTSA will be the next program that leaves us in the dust. They had 46,000 in attendance against Texas State last week in San Antonio to watch two WINLESS teams square off. Imagine what the crowd would have been like if UTSA had a winning record.
    There's a lot of baggage to carry around on the tail end of that 118 year journey.

    Upstarts are unencumbered.

  8. #168

    Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Quote Originally Posted by Oiler View Post
    No doubt about it, we're a lower level G5 team this year with lower level talent. I think we're probably in the bottom 15 or so of all FBS teams, but you have to remember, we've only been playing football for 110 years or so. It's not like we've been at this as long as schools like UCF, USF, and FAU. It's sickening to me when I compare us to programs like these and what they've accomplished in just their first couple of decades of being in existence.

    UTSA will be the next program that leaves us in the dust. They had 46,000 in attendance against Texas State last week in San Antonio to watch two WINLESS teams square off. Imagine what the crowd would have been like if UTSA had a winning record.
    So much about success is having a reliable recruiting area. This is something UL has never been able to foster. We have heard numerous coaches say LA will be our focus, but in the end we are scouring the southeast for players other programs may have over looked. It sometimes works spectacularly but it is not a replacement for a strong recuiting footprint. We see this even with P5 teams. Where are Nebraska or Michigan getting their players? When I was growing up these schools could go into Dallas, NOLA or Florida and get premium skill talent. Now they can't, and their stature has been reduced.
    UL will be relevant in football when they carve out a reliable recruiting niche in LA, East Texas and southern MS. It looks like Napier is trying to do just that.

  9. Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    There's a lot of baggage to carry around on the tail end of that 118 year journey.

    Upstarts are unencumbered.
    Baggage fees are everywhere these days.

  10. #170

    Default Re: Napier: 'Sometimes it takes a crisis' to get attention

    Maybe we can get Jalen hurts to transfer here. Kelly Bryant is transferring too. They can battle it out over here for the starting position. Talk about a crisis


Page 17 of 18 FirstFirst ... 7 14 15 16 17 18 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. UL's Logo Crisis
    By Turbine in forum Up On LA (Academics)
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: October 14th, 2009, 06:58 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •