The chance to cut the lead to eight evaporated when we went for two and failed earlier. Had we kicked the point, it would have been an eight point game.
Coaches will never learn. YOu go for two when you HAVE to.
I disagree. Because we went for 2, we knew later in the game what we had to do to win which meant we had to get TD's instead of FG's. Its like opting to get the ball second in OT, you want to know what you need to do.
The chance to cut the lead to eight evaporated when we went for two and failed earlier. Had we kicked the point, it would have been an eight point game.
Coaches will never learn. YOu go for two when you HAVE to.
I still don't understand why we went for two. I guess it was so we could reduce the deficit to three but it was so early in the game to be thinking that way.