Originally Posted by CajunRebel
My guess would be more along the lines of getting funds cut. Also, i think painting the "lafayette" green on a green field is better than everything else.
Originally Posted by CajunRebel
My guess would be more along the lines of getting funds cut. Also, i think painting the "lafayette" green on a green field is better than everything else.
There was a time when I would have agreed with your statement. I still agree that it is more important to put a good product on the field and start winning games. However, we continually hear the "university policy" on what we should or shouldn't be called; then they turn around and start proliferating "Lafayette". Hey, I agree its a great place to be and live; but if our own officials continue to display/use "Lafayette", then its going to be a much longer road to becoming recognized as the "University of Louisiana". A lot of folks on this board have been living with this issue for over 20 years now. So I can see how its easy to get would up about it.Originally Posted by sonsissymia
In the past month two people I know called us Lafayette and they thought they were correct. If the policy makers can't see the result they are blind.
Such comments are quite silly.Originally Posted by sonsissymia
The discussion on this forum does not affect the play on the field one single iota. Talk about the name and other issues that you might think are silly will not make the team play any worse and talk about the X's and O's will not make them play any better. That's what these forums are for: for people to talk about whatever they want to regarding UL athletics. If you don't like it, don't click on the discussion. You can go be Paul Bryant in another thread.
debOriginally Posted by CDeb
yesterday it was suggested i not listen to Jay's show 'if i didn't like it.' today you suggest i go to another thread 'if i don't like' the discussion. all because i post something the replier disagrees with. deb, how do you have discussions if all the sides of the issue aren't explored? i know you don't like it to be ul-lafayette, but you don't want it to be ul-bejing either, right? it's still a free country, right?, and i can be in whatever discussion i choose, right? so deb, although i'd like you to, i'm not going to suggest that YOU go to another thread.
The University of Lousiana followed by where you are located is one thing. . .
But when Lafayette is the singular focus I have a problem.
Lafayette is the singular focus of UL-Lafayette
If you look in the back of the media guide, the section that talks about proper reference to the university's name is titled "Its Louisiana-Lafayette!"Originally Posted by SugarLandCajun
That doesn't look like a mixed message to me, it looks like the wrong message!
where is the "at"?Originally Posted by BabbForHeisman
According to the law, Lafayette only needs to be included if "University of" precedes Louisiana.
Wins is what draws attention, not the field.Originally Posted by sonsissymia
That's a funny post coming from you as you basically told people we shouldn't be worrying about it.Originally Posted by sonsissymia
Sometimes you have to break the rules.Originally Posted by CajunRebel
I think I agree 100%. Now I don't think we should be wiping "lafayette" off of our our official university logos but if we were to just put "LOUISIANA" in the endzones I can guarantee you no one will be cutting our funding.Originally Posted by ulfanatic
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)