Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 25 to 28 of 28

Thread: La Louisianne...what the hey?

  1. #25

    Default Re: La Louisianne...what the hell?

    I just want to say that whoever gave me a red dot for starting a thread about being disappointed in the way we were referred to in La Louisianne is a punk.

    ...that is all.


  2. Default Re: La Louisianne...what the hey?

    Reading Kathleen Thames stuff is like reading Kathleen Thames full name 5 times in a single paragraph when a first or last name will do. At some point you have to go to to just first or last or title instead of the full Kathleen Thames.

    Now that Julie Simon Dronet is exonerated, or at least become her natural self and now that we know Julie's hands were tied with UL references . . .

    My question is; who is responsible for tying Kathleen Thames hands as far as no UL reference variations allowed in a Kathleen Thames article or Kathleen Thames publication? I hope it is not Kathleen Thames.

    I'm not a writer, but I would never do something like that.


  3. #27

    Ragin' Cajuns Re: La Louisianne...what the hell?

    Quote Originally Posted by ultoday View Post
    No, No, No, No, No, NOCajun!

    It is not law. It's a rule from the UL System.

    And remember, UL athletics breaks the rule all the time. In fact, I don't think they follow the rule anywhere.
    Hope that doesn't mean you're going to call the police and RAT on 'em...

  4. #28

    Default Re: La Louisianne...what the hell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Damon View Post
    You've also learned to enjoy your shaves.
    LOL!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •