I just want to say that whoever gave me a red dot for starting a thread about being disappointed in the way we were referred to in La Louisianne is a punk.
...that is all.
I just want to say that whoever gave me a red dot for starting a thread about being disappointed in the way we were referred to in La Louisianne is a punk.
...that is all.
Reading Kathleen Thames stuff is like reading Kathleen Thames full name 5 times in a single paragraph when a first or last name will do. At some point you have to go to to just first or last or title instead of the full Kathleen Thames.
Now that Julie Simon Dronet is exonerated, or at least become her natural self and now that we know Julie's hands were tied with UL references . . .
My question is; who is responsible for tying Kathleen Thames hands as far as no UL reference variations allowed in a Kathleen Thames article or Kathleen Thames publication? I hope it is not Kathleen Thames.
I'm not a writer, but I would never do something like that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)