i am stunned that in so negative and derisive an article he actually referred to the university as "UL" a few times.
Don't see a preferences menu under IE7.
I don't think he did. I think some were changed. There is a link to the original article elsewhere in another thread, but I'll include it here anyway.
http://www.americanpress.com/index.p...1642&Itemid=96
I second that!
That article was a bit hard to read, but I am afraid it rang true to some extent... man, it actually hurt for me to say that.
Regardless, geaux rouge, geaux blanc!
Wait! I once knew a guy that left his team. So what? Get over it.
Wait! Hundley was suppose to get playing time last Saturday? Why? So he could get snapped, crackled and popped too? Oh... he was going to tro da deep ball like Jamie Howard at da big kid's school. Big arm... oops.
Hummm? But, waaaa... he shoulda got a shot. Well, why didn't John Smith get a shot at kicking? Or John Deaux at blocking? Or Studly Doitright get a shot at running back? Oh yeow... all of the other positions were kicking butt... it was just a QB problem.
Geeeee... are we gonna lose all da players who don't get playing time? Cause... ya know... da guy dat's backin you up is always bedder dan you. Das a fact!
To all the quitters out there.... see ya!
I have to agree with what you said. Usually executing an offense will make it work. If not then you have to change it. You can't change that in the middle of a game. Perhaps we simply don't have the players. You could have Bill Walsh coaching but if the talent is there then it will not matter. I don't see where MD lost the game for us. As far as Hundley leaving, his timing is rather suspect and not a good sign. Perhaps there are personal reasons we don't know about. If he is leaving because we lost then I find his character suspect and don't let the door hit you on the way out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)