My Own Comparison Of 2000vs2005
Starting Pitchers: Adv 2000//dohmann,gros,gabriel,templet,webb We Had Five Potent Starters//only Two On 2005 Team
Relief Pitchers: Adv 2000//welborne,bullinger,obrien They Were Lights Out//just More Depth Than 2005 Sham Is Feast Or Faming
1st Base: Adv 2005//hawke And Tafford Way Better Than Poche And Atwood//they Are More Consitent
2nd Base: Tie 2000 Had Gill And Simoneaux Both Of Them Drafted Although Gill Was Drafted As A Pitcher, Gill Played A Variety Of Position So Really Hard To Judge, Dino Is Scrappy And A Real Team Leader
Shortstop: Adv 2005 Haydel Was Clutch But Also Inconsintent, 2005 Cockrell And Parker Provide More Depth
3rd Base: Tie Nelson Had Better Avg And Speed, But Moriss More Power And Better Defense
Catcher: Adv 2005 Massiatte Was The Best Ever Both Off And Def Wise, But 2005 Is Solid Lucroy Will Be Special, Morgan Is The True Team Player And Has Been A Good Surprise His Def Skills Are Off The Chart, Adam As Played Well At Times. 2oo5 Way More Depth, 2000 On Danny And Justin Boyd Who Didnt Even Play
Left Field: Adv 2005 Landry Is Better Than Hawkins And Really Is Solid All Across The Board
Center Field: Slight Adv 2000 Feehan Played Four Years While Coker Only Two Coker Srugeled Last Year But Has Played Well This Year And Could Be The Fastest Cajun Every
Right Field: Adv 2005 Mcarthy Has Been The Best Surprise This Year, Clark Was More Of A Power Guy And If The Umpires Would Have Got The Call Right Clark Didnt Trap The Ball Against Stanford We Would Have Been National Champs In 2000 Whe Would Have Been Unstoppable Had Phil Devey And Jeff Robinson Came Back For There Sr Years